I've been wondering if it was a good replacement for the playwright mcp, at least for chrome-only testing.
67 karma · joined November 21, 2023
Licences also existed before FOSS, but open sources licences enabling the kind of freedoms that they allow did not exist. And as it happens, a license is not a technical artefact but a social contract. Stallman is activist, not simply a neutral combination of a technician and a lawyer.
The social contract and political vision are consequently not ancillary, but core to FOSS. Code is the medium, but the license is the innovation. Without that social contract, 'open' code is just abandonware.
The community doesn't need to be a 'house party,' but the license guarantees the right for a community to form when the original author walks away.
The only one I'm looking forward currently is the next version of Logseq which will enable collaboration on their existing block-based authoring model.
1) point both involved and uninvolved people to the code of conduct when you end up taking action.
2) avoid disparity of enforcement within your team
3) funnel disagreements (from both teammates or community members) by focusing them on the rule, rather than on a general debate on how should the community should be managed.
If people commit a lot of energy to a community/project then for many "I didn't like this behavior, end of discussion" won't cut it.
But because MacWhisper does not store transcripts or do much with them (other than giving you export options), there are some missed opportunities: I'd love to be able to add project tags to transcripts, so that any new transcript is summarized with the context of all previous transcript summaries that share the same tag. Thinking about it maybe I should build a Logseq extension to do that myself as I store all my meeting summaries there anyway.
Speaker detection is not great in MacWhisper (at least in my context where I work mostly with non native English speakers), so that would be a good differentiation too.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-should-improve-society-som...
Yes it does when pondering about the transferability of the skills mobilized to achieve the result (grandmaster status) to other domains.
My results were
- 3 Dive 11 skim, 16 skip.
- 1 dive would have been a skim, 2 skim would have been a skip, 2 skim would have been a dive, 4 skips would have been a skim, 1 skip would have been a dive.
- Total mislabelled: 10, ~30% across and within each category.
Some thoughts:
- it's hard to get it right without a taxonomy of content. I wouldn't skim an essay (Conversations with a hit man). I either dive or skip.
- Skimming is also often a first check before diving, so the categorisation can be a bit artificial.
- I think "Would Read Later" could be an interesting signal/label, like bookmarks on Instagram.
As an aside, I didn't know that the popover technique could be done with html and CSS only, neat! I'll use this for my learning content in-line glossary links from now on.
If a Cloudflare security engineer ends up missing the use of a deprecated functionality during a public experiment where they know they'll face very intense scrutiny, what will happen down the line, when llm use is normalized in security contexts?