At 24b, I think this has a good chance of fitting on my more memory constrained work computer.
1,359 karma · joined July 23, 2017
I work in renewable energy, and I build mobile apps for consumers joining the renewable energy revolution. We need to do more to address climate change, today!
I'm here to talk about renewable energy, apps, EVs, LGBTQ+ identity, leadership, games, realtime rendering, AI & Tech politics and policy, curating content, and...whatever else seems interesting.
At 24b, I think this has a good chance of fitting on my more memory constrained work computer.
I give my engineers different Android phones as their primary development devices and yet the weird Android issues that keep cropping up are near constant.
Edit: coverage with better reporting & screenshots of the problem: https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/30/24258693/ps5-update-news-..., https://www.ign.com/articles/ps5-homescreen-now-replaces-uni...
Bombardier thought so, and did so! They developed and introduced the C-series aircraft to compete with smaller 737s and A320/A319. After introduction, Boeing fucked them over so hard that they sold the aircraft program after introduction to Airbus for a token sum. Airbus now builds and sells the C-series as the A220.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSeries_dumping_petition_by_Bo...
Edit, w/ real time follow up:
Prior to buying the credits, I saw O1-preview in the Tier 5 model list as a Tier 4 user. I bought credits to bump to Tier 5—not much, I'd have gotten there before the end of the year. The OpenAI website now shows I'm in Tier 5, but O1-preview is not in the Tier 5 model list for me anymore. So sneaky of them!
I'm still keeping my preorder, but I'm a bit more cautious.
> said that the company had gotten the precise location of about 10 million G.M. cars up to every one to three seconds, but that the data did not include identifying details about the driver.
The word "Anonymously" means exactly nothing here. If one's exact location and movements are collected, wouldn't that include a lot of time and datapoints where the car is spending time at work and home locations?
Seems incredibly trivial at that point to deanonymize usage.
> In short, I believe that the revealed objectives of LLM vendors differ starkly from what they say. They pour considerable resources into responding to every trollish LLM transcript that goes viral on the internet — and it’s useful to ponder why.
I'd be pretty interested in reading at how people do poke at LLMs and what this actually reveals about the vendors priorities.
But I don't think this is a now problem, in the age of AI, but has been a growing problem for decades as software has matured.
For a rather dense document from 2004, is any of this worth casual study and still relevant?