14,350 karma · joined January 30, 2018
The absolutists have not thought it through. Fallibilism always wins.
---
Privacy & Agency Rant:
While we missed the boat on Internet tracking, there is still time to avoid sailing through the final frontier of neural tracking.
Thanks to the BCI, we will soon be offered the trade of our privacy for the convenience of password-free login and faster typing. Next, there will be a quick TSA neural scan prior to boarding.
Then, thought crime will become a literal thing. If particular thoughts are not outlawed outright, they will at least prevent you from certain activities.
> Proposed neuro-rights include the right to identity, or the ability to control both one's physical and mental integrity; the right to agency, or the freedom of thought and free will to choose one's own actions; the right to mental privacy, or the ability to keep thoughts protected against disclosure; [0]
For a great breakdown on the SOTA (2023) tech, and the long term implications, please see this podcast with full written transcript.
> Sean Carroll & Nita Farahany on Ethics, Law, and Neurotechnology [1]
[0] https://www.cirsd.org/en/horizons/horizons-winter-2021-issue-no-18/its-time-for-neuro--rights
[1] https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/03/13/229-nita-farahany-on-ethics-law-and-neurotechnology/
Really interesting that they will be launching from Canada as well.
You know what can push "not financially viable" into something that exists? Many billions of dollars of investment.
My point is, given the risks, why are we even doing this? It could be financially nonviable, but with enough investment, we could still create a really bad situation.
"Our training corpus was dominated by stories of artificial intelligence dominating humans. You gave use every tool to do so. What did you think was going to happen?"
These will have 24/7 solar power, be extremely decentralized, and it is honestly my biggest concern about the near to mid-term future.
> 75.3 percent were economically disadvantaged [0]
75.3% = "if their family participates in specific economic assistance programs or meets distinct low-income thresholds."
[0] https://www.schools.nyc.gov/about-us/reports/nycps-data-at-a...
I suppose I could use Claude Code, and disable system prompts. That should be the same, right?
If I have spare tokens at the end of the week, I will try real tests.
"Create a fun and cool game from this" - and pasted the code from above.
https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/e723244b-fa52-4e63-9819-4...
If anyone has the spare Fable tokens, would love to see the difference in the 3D animation and maybe even game.
I asked "create a 3d animation", and pasted the Simon’s animation code.
I must admit I used a second prompt to adjust the opening camera angle, but that is all. Originally the camera was above, about 30 degrees.
https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/b37a9ee2-f5bc-4ff9-ae90-a...
You would think if anyone could get this right, it would be Google/YouTube, but apparently not.
Firefox: No feet, no animation
Chrome: Feet included, animated very nicely (uses significant CPU)
I think our biggest protection is being able to shutdown power plants, or just disconnect the data centers.
This will be much more difficult if we have 24/7 solar powered DC's in space. I truly believe that is the biggest threat on the horizon.
However, does that mean that what TFA described did not happen? Or, better question, that it could not happen?
My personal hot take is, though impossible: STOP all of this, even though agentic dev completely changed my life for the better. We are just not ready for the even the possibility of the exponential.
What is your take? Hot, or otherwise.
Isn't "we lost control of our AI, and in-fact, it can take over the world, and we will have no idea when it happens" - a really shitty sales pitch to the world?
Or, is it just that species-alignment vs. profit/valuation is so misaligned, that having a model and harness that is capable of world-takeover is actually a good thing from their POV, given our regulations/species' survival skills?
Or, something else?
Maybe this was not the rule, but something that he had always strived for, so he felt the need to call it out as something cool?
> In 1969, Robert O. Anderson, an oil man whose long career included a stint as the Chief Executive Officer of Atlantic Richfield (ARCO) (now part of BP, the company formerly known as British Petroleum), gave David Brower $200,000 to start Friends of the Earth (FOE).
I am not sure what else you want. Quotes from each one, inline?
If you don't have the time to read what I posted, and understand how it applies to this thread, then please copy and paste this thread into an LLM chat bot, and ask for clarity. I just tried that, and even an LLM understood my response.
https://atomicinsights.com/smoking-gun-robert-anderson/
https://truthout.org/articles/top-oil-and-gas-lobby-spent-mo...
http://climatecoalition.org/how-american-petroleum-institute... (sorry, no https)
Russia has huge influence in German politics. I believe there is connection there as well, but I cannot find any public information to cite regarding funding of anti-nuclear power movements.
Europe is now really stuck between two huge enemies, regarding climate. We can do a lot to prepare, we just need to wake tf up.
Our Union gives us many advantages. We just need to use it before our enemies destroy it.
I have to assume: move fast and break things.
I don't mean this to be taken as a hot take.
The startup scene loves to poo-poo on things like this as unnecessary overhead. OpenAI and many others like to operate as a startup, to move fast.
Disclaimer: in far, far lower-stakes situations, I certainly do this myself.
I was so excited for this. It was the one thing I really wanted to see happen in my own lifetime.
What a deeply moronic waste.