1,884 karma · joined March 30, 2008
"I don't think there's any way to sugarcoat this, but 2015 has not been a particularly great year for Qualcomm in the high-end SoC business" -- http://www.anandtech.com/show/9837/snapdragon-820-preview
If you compare geekbench single threaded performance numbers, you can sure see why Google is anxious to build their own silicon.
1. The prevalance of low-end Android devices
2. The dominance of Android worldwide, e.g. http://www.idc.com/prodserv/smartphone-os-market-share.jsp shows 2015Q2, android 82.8%, iOS 13.9%, everything else ~3%
We've also been working with Google to see what they can do to make Android/Chrome performance better with complex JavaScript like Ember and Angular. Chrome 45 improved things about 25% which is great, but when you start 500 to 800% slower, there's a long way to go..
Complex JavaScript performance on iOS is, and remains, amazing and stellar. Problem is not much of the world is on iOS.
Free product so they can do what they want, but this feels a bit abrupt (how about six months to transition) and cruel (forced MailChimp account plus giant leap in pricing).
Would it cost them so much in brand loyalty to be a bit more generous with time to transition and cost?
> Clinkle had a polished demo that came before things like Apple Pay, said one former employee, who declined to be named. But most importantly that person added, Duplan “was charismatic when he wanted to be” and could “raise money in absurd abundance.”
You really want to change the world? Forget being a programmer, learn to be be charismatic.
For example: http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Fanless-i5-Mini-PC-Windows-Ba...
I initally looked on Amazon and found the fitlet-i, which is nice for a 4.5w TDP AMD box..
http://www.fit-pc.com/web/products/specifications/fitlet-mod...
.. but these aliexpress deals are far better, and easily 3x faster if you can afford the 15w TDP budget.
We waited a year for this to "stabilize" but it never did.
There is a point of diminishing returns, of course, pushing down to $5/month is a lot of pain -- super low cost super low resource hosting, etc.
That'll be a while, of course, but already we see attackers with access to a tremendous number of unique IP addresses in the IPV4 space.. they'll have many orders of magnitude more soon.
But the Apple turn was a pure consumer play, all bottom up.
"Some could be.." is computing by coincidence, and I'm not a fan of that logic. You can refer to the 2007, 2009, and 2012 studies for measured data on server farms.
This commenter seemed quite credible to me, here's where it starts:
http://discourse.codinghorror.com/t/to-ecc-or-not-to-ecc/377...
> Yep, these are what we had -- uncorrectable errors with ECC memory caused by row hammer. Luckily there are mitigations. Sandy Bridge allows you to double...