No, consent is just one of the legal bases you can use to justify handling someone's personal data, legitimate interests is another. Their privacy policy should explain if they're using another basis. The ICO have a list of the valid bases https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protectio...
If you're deploying your own application, you should probably build your image from a known maintained base image, rather than from a community supported one, and then periodically rebuild it - it's like how you'd have to redeploy your app if there was a security issue in one of your dependencies. I wouldn't recommend using any of the public Docker images outside of local dev environments
It's not just "1 single VM" though, as you'll have to configure the applications on top of that. Configuring/installing a Postgres instance on a VM, nginx for your load balancers, iptables for your firewall, user accounts, an application server (could be as simple as forever for a NodeJS app, or Gunicorn or something for Python, etc). And if you want to automate that (as it sounds like you do), you're still writing a bunch of Ansible and Terraform. I'm not sure that it is any easier or less time consuming, unless you already know one way and not the other, and have to bake in time to learn to one approach.
I believe this is something that already happens in certain countries with Coca-Cola bottling plants, where when local droughts happen, the plant is protected over the local population.
This just seems to be a list of answers to common "trivia" questions, which are becoming much less popular in interviews, and often are just one part of it, rather than a guide to a whole interview
Managing latency is a problem, as you can only encrypt fairly short packets at a time and send each one out, rather than the whole message, and the structure of the data being different can lead to information leakage
These are fairly common clauses. I've normally found that asking your manager for permission to work on a side project is sufficient to waive the appropriate rights and most will agree (I wrote a tech book with a similar clause in my contract and got permission from my manager to do so). If not, it's the kind of thing a union can help you with if you're a member.
In the UK, I have a "full fibre" provider (Hyperoptic) which pretty much exclusively serve apartment blocks. They run fibre to a switch they install in the building, and then ethernet cabling from that switch to every apartment. Targetting dense buildings I suspect gives them a really good cost/customer upfront ratio (in some cities they own their own fibre, in others they use other commercial providers, including Openreach which was spun out of the former state monopoly BT and has to provide fair rates to competitors). The latter seems like a reasonable trade off of government regulation and free market to encourage competition, I suspect the lobbying culture in the US wouldn't allow it though.
As far as I can get the argument boils down to "the model is stochastic", "Fortran is old" and "the code is spaghetti". Of which the first one is deliberate, the second one I don't see as a problem, and the last one is definitely a risk factor, but is far from a guarantee that the model is flawed or broken.
I think the creativity here should be applauded, it's an interesting novel improvement to an existing pattern. I think it'd be very interesting to do a bit of a formal usability study on this: set some metrics for common tasks and ask people to do them versus a control group and see how well it performs. I think sometimes we get all caught up with the hype of UX, but a good old study like we did back when we called the field HCI would be enlightening here. You could even get a published paper out of it!
16 fibre pairs doesn't seem like very much? I wonder what the constraining factors are, as surely the material costs of having hundreds of pairs are negligible compared to the install costs? Is it amplification?
The legislators haven't legislated for a particular mechanism, they've just said that any tracking has to be opt in, as opposed to opt out. Do Not Track was a technical solution for this, but when IE made do not track the default, and tracking something you had to opt in to, they panicked and stopped supporting the headers and instead preferring the cookie walls, rather than trusting the browser settings. If websites respected UA settings, and the UA implemented DNT in a way that's compatible with the law (so, DNT: 0 only when you opt in), then we wouldn't be here
Music videos are still awesome works of cinematography, production, visual, and musical art. Videos like APESHIT from The Carters, Lady Gaga's Telephone, Childish Gambino's This is America, and pretty much anything from OK Go have been at least equal to the best videos made from that era.
It's not fair for a lens of nostalgia to mean you're comparing the best videos of an era to an average video from a current one.
Culture Shift | Backend Developer and Frontend Developer | Manchester, UK | £45-65k | Full-time (open to flexibility) | majority ONSITE | https://www.culture-shift.co.uk/
Our flagship product is a web-based system for reporting and managing reports of bullying and harassment within organisations. We've recently received series A funding to grow our dev team to really accelerate our product roadmap and focus on empowering organisations to make positive culture change.
At the moment we're all working from home, and are conducting interviews remotely (round one being a interview with the wider team to get an understanding of your motivations and ways of working, and the second interview being more technical in nature). If you have any questions, please let me know chris@culture-shift.co.uk.
Our tech stack is serverless TypeScript deployed on AWS Lambda with PostgreSQL, exposing a GraphQL API using Cognito for auth and AppSync, and on the frontend, we're using Apollo & React.
"The quicker we stop the spread, the quicker we can all go back to our normal lives"
Actually no, it's the opposite. "flattening the curve" means spreading the period of time infection spreads to not overwhelm the medical services at any one point. So the quicker we slow down the spread, the longer it'll take to get back to normal.
The idea we can completely stop the spread at this point is unlikely, the best we can do is slow it.
That assumes that all money is of equal value. Which on one level it is, but on another level, the relative purchasing power in different geographic areas is a real thing. Normalising based on that means that in effect you're paying people for the same relative quality of life, rather than same absolute value, which can be very different relatively.
In HTML, "linking" is a contraction of "hyperlinking". I guess deep linking and hyperlinking have a significant cross-over, maybe to the point where it's not a useful distinction?