cj

Very few businesses care about accommodating "one in a trillion" edge cases. (Most would call that over-engineering IMO)

The listings I saw with AI staging usually alternated photos, 1 photo unstaged, the next photo staged.

Which meant you could toggle between the staged and unstaged photo. I didn’t notice any warping or distortion.

I dunno.

I've been watching "How it's made" on Hulu to fall asleep at night.

I’m constantly surprised by how many things are made with human hands, despite the ability to automate.

I'm assuming "AI images" means realtors using AI to stage empty rooms with furniture.

I'm honestly fine with that as long as it's labeled.

Having just done an apartment search a few months ago, AI staged images are surprisingly good quality. It's difficult to detect it as AI when going through a bunch of listings quickly. But yea, I guess it can cause confusion if it sticks a Peloton (or whatever) in a space where it won't actually fit.

Thank you private equity.

These look like real desks people actually work at!

Why are these not on the homepage...

Filing lawsuits against ex-employees is going pretty far. Not good PR for Apple if their claims are wrong.

Companies often file frivolous lawsuits against other companies. It’s much rarer to throw frivolous lawsuits at individuals.

If you have holdings that are locked up, are you allowed to short stock or use options to hedge your position?

> They're not wrong, they're just not helpful or accomplishing anything.

I think what it accomplishes is developing a shared understanding of the pros/cons of the tech, the risks associated, how we should mitigate those risks, where the tech is appropriate vs. not appropriate, etc.

It feels very dismissive to say that these conversations aren't worth having. Or that we're thinking about these things too much.

I get that it's tiring, especially in the HN echo chamber. But the conversations are still worth having IMO.

Don't use calculator as an analogy, then.

Calculators are a simple machine that implement very basic rules.

LLMs are in a different category. The parallels you can draw between LLMs and calculators.. just don't make sense.

Now imagine if your calculator billed per button press.

And imagine you can't own a calculator because owning one outright requires too much hardware (or whatever).

Engineering headcount.

How many highways and bridges charge tolls via license plate reading cameras? A lot, it's legal, and I would be surprised if that data was used only for processing tolls.

> I have had plenty of disagreements with dang over my time on this site

To think that someone has multiple / repeated disagreements with Dang is wild to me.

In my history on this site, I have not once seen Dang say or do anything that’s not in the best interest of the community.

He’s possibly one of the least controversial moderators I have ever encountered online.

TLDR: The insurance market is highly regulated, with measures in place to protect customers if your insurance company becomes insolvent. Corgi does not have those protections, because they've figured out how to offer a product similar to insurance without being regulated like a normal insurance company.

Innovation!

> In the long run, every piece of software tends towards mediocrity.

Alternative view: Maybe that's okay, and greybeards know that.

Mediocre: "something of only moderate or ordinary quality"

Maybe we don't need the latest and greatest extraordinary technology when coding our next CRUD app.

There's a tiktok of Sam Altman reacting to a viral clip of someone using Voice to time themselves on a mile run (it hilariously failed).

Sam's reaction was "Yea, it doesn't have access to tools like a timer. It's a known issue. Should be coming in about a year"

Edit: here's the clip: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Py2YgJe8fqQ

See also: Bitcoin, Tesla/Musk, Apple

I mean let's face it, most of us reading this comment are medically obese and would probably live at least 2-3 years longer if we lost 20 pounds.

So why don't we?

He's probably looking for evidence of "Since beginning of 2025". (I'm curious too)

Feels like we've been on the same train for over a decade.

Not that it really matters, but the article also refers to it as “drawing water to the top”. That seems more representative of reality than “pumping water from the bottom”.

I’m not convinced model productivity will scale forever.

Presumably there are a lot of use cases that are essentially “solved” where more powerful models won’t matter.

> I sensed once that I had irritated someone

Solid advice, (but to others reading) don’t optimize for not irritating people.

Especially your professional network. You built those relationships because you wanted to use them in the future, and the future is now… so, tap them! If they don’t like that, no big deal, no sweat, move on.

If you’re irritating multiple people constantly, then yea you’re probably doing something wrong. But if it’s one person once in a blue moon, that happens, don’t over optimize for avoiding that. You can’t make everyone happy

"To play this Blueray, you must renew your encryption key"

Is that really a thing?

Except I mailed the cash in advance! It’s okay, it was probably another 14 year old.

My parents were not happy when I told them I sent cash to a stranger. I remember having to do it in secret because they were very not okay with the idea that you can meet strangers online. Hah.

Magical indeed!

I once mailed $70 cash (multiple months of allowance) to someone to code a MVP of something I wanted to build.

They ripped me off and disappeared.

And… that’s when I decided I needed to learn to code!

Double unlock.

In the mid 2000’s, I moderated a domain name discussion forum in exchange for free hosting. “X forum posts per month = x gb of bandwidth”

My goal was to post enough for them to give me WHM access so I could try to resell it.

Those were the days.

I prefer talking to humans over poking a touchscreen.

It works about as well as replacing your barista with an iPad.

SpaceX: "Not an AI company, but priced like one"

Tesla: "Not a tech company, but priced like one"