cinntaile

It's not going to reduce any time soon. Either way the reality is that sometimes fossil fuel power plants make sense, that's why they're still being built.

> Americans know because we can access our US court decisions, unlike any other country in the world.

This is not a uniquely US thing?

> It depends on what you are optimizing for and what is geographically, (geo)politically and economically possible.

I mentioned all of this in my message. What was unclear about it or did you perhaps not read past the first sentence?

I don't know what you mean with "no safe level of fossil fuel use". It doesn't mean anything without contextualizing that statement.

People arguing for one alternative over the other are usually politically motivated. I feel like you are doing the same. Sometimes nuclear is a good fit, sometimes renewables is a good fit, sometimes fossil fuels are a good fit. Most of the time a mix is the best fit. It depends on what you are optimizing for and what is geographically, (geo)politically and economically possible. All these systems are then built using assumptions, sometimes those assumptions no longer make sense after a certain period of time and sometimes you just temporarily or permanently have to adapt to the changes in the environment. This is an unusual but expected scenario for the nuclear plants along the Danube.

Did I miss something? When did Spacex get into the fab business?

I think the no action results speak for themselves. I'm not sure what there is to disagree about to be honest.

Nobody is pressing charges because nothing happened. It wasn't nefarious either.

I don't get what France has to do with this Huggingface and OpenAI are both US companies.

They paywalled it before LLMs.

Its market value is clearly not high enough or they wouldn't use it in disposable vapes.

Nowadays people would have guessed it was Model Context Protocol.

Yes I have asked you this many times, but you have not answered it even once.

Sure, pick one of their sources to support your claims. If they already did the job for you it should be very easy.

To reiterate your claims:

> Sweden has, more than any other country, faced an astounding and shocking rise of intense violence and organized crime, with shootings in the middle of cities and cafés, all linked to people that were openly accepted through its refugee programs.

1. Which link proves that Sweden has had a more shocking rise of intense violence and organized crime than all other countries in the world?

2. Which link proves that they are all linked to people that were openly accepted through its refugee programs?

Regarding 1. it would also be interesting to know which time period you are referring to, because that's pretty much a prerequisite for a claim like that.

You didn't link it because it was an interesting thesis, you linked it to back up your claims when I asked for a source. Which it didn't do. You still need to provide a source for your claims. You can also retract your claims of course, that's fine too.

You tell me, you claimed to know their plans. I don't know where you got that info from?

I checked the official source, which should be considered the authoritative source imo?

I just checked. They haven't published their political standpoints yet so it's too early to say. They claim they will soon, ahead of the elections.

> Sweden has, more than any other country, faced an astounding and shocking rise of intense violence and organized crime, with shootings in the middle of cities and cafés, all linked to people that were openly accepted through its refugee programs.

You claimed two things that I took issue with: The rise of intense violence and organized crime is higher than in any other country. All those crimes are linked to people openly accepted through its refugee programmes.

A student thesis about "The Ripple Effect of Gang Violence" does not back up these claims.

I am well aware that Sweden has had an increase in intense violence and organized crime in recent years, but that is not what you claimed. You were more specific.

It should be very simple to link to sources that back up your claims then.

I guess we're all just using our own definition of freedom. It'll make reasonable discussions incredibly difficult however.

More than any other country... I'm not too sure about that, there are a lot of countries on this planet. What period are you looking at? I assume relative numbers. I'm also skeptical about your other claim that it's all linked to people that came to Sweden through refugee programs. Do you have any sources to back up your claims?

> As if it isn’t a problem that their CEO is supporting policies that go against everything that Mullvad stands for as a company.

Mullvads mission is about privacy and against mass surveillance. That mission has nothing to do with their co-CEOs personal stance on immigration. I don't necessarily see the conflict of interest that the blog talks about?

Is this a very limited release or why not just give it a few weeks and you'll get seats without any trouble?

Rage induced development?

That's very much not a smart fan. Not really relevant.

It's mostly cause you're new here, that's the issue. You have no "reputation".

I gave you an upvote, to help keep your head above the water.

Settlements after the fact, not agreements beforehand.

No that's not something. That's just having infinitely more money to fight legal battles.

I'm going to assume you're being ironic.

On mobile the site is not properly scaled, I need to horizonally scroll. I'm not into ants so I won't register but this is what I like to see. An expert within a specific field that thanks to AI can now build niche tools that are helpful. Keep it up!

They should have read Uncle Bob's book.

The GP is joking.