chunsj

Here, smart means intellectual quality and their subject on leadership is private profit making. Why the rest of us should like those smart (highly intellectual, however their interest lies in their own profit) leader?

I'd like to see the study on the subject of public/social interest and I think that the result will be different.

Who orders should take more responsibility.

I am not sure on the only solution is UBI however it would be better than current status quo. At least the author knows the exact status of South Korean.

Their choice of license is great; the real free software license which can keep its freedom and openness.

Basic income is not free money, it's redistribution so that every people can live humane life.

Oh, this is another example of why fake news works.

Cho is a korean as well. Though I'm not sure on his current nationality. Yes, there might be some difference in the style of playing Go, which I do not know the detail.

Though I'm not that expert on this area, can Intel make H/W (FPGA) as S/W commodity by making FPGA design as open source or equivalent unlike other or existing vendors? If Intel can do this, I think in the long term, Intel can re-take their competence.

Yes, it can embed the cost. However the problem solving approach should be social one; more tax from who can afford, which means in this case, the car owners. Without social, community based approach, the solution surely become less protective and more discrimitive to poor people.