2,065 karma · joined October 25, 2011
> In other words, you are implying that some appreciation of the value of planning is something that only some cultures possess.
Actually, it is something only some cultures practice. (Not possess, just practice. Everyone can view time with a perspective in the future, but not all cultures default to that view.) It's just like how some cultures do not distinguish between green and blue colors (or how we do not distinguish between different types of snow.)
But no, you go ahead and claim the real racists are the ones examining racism. I'm sure that's not what people backed into a corner do or anything.
This is called "cultural bias"; it means that, should a student from another culture come into our schools, they should not feel wrong for being raised in an environment that doesn't promote individualism. Stuff like, "Don't be a sheep!" and, "You are your own person. Don't let anyone take that away from you!" can make them feel out of place and other'ed. Notice how the part you quoted says "as opposed to a more collective ideology." That means they want to get rid of pinning individualism against collectivism; they don't want to get rid of individualism.
I'm not sure what the rest of your comment means, though. Even if that specific phrase is a problem, the rest of the document is all great stuff.
Those words echo through my head every time I click open one of these threads on HN. It's like suddenly the rich white guy is getting oppressed, so we're obviously in a police state! Never mind for the years leading up to this point, the US was doing much worse shit; they just happened to be doing it to minorities.
And you can see it in this thread. Everyone concentrating on the fact he was detained, not the reasons, when the whole damn article is about how the US treats people who look like they're from certain countries like default terrorists.
[0]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper_Text_Coffee_Pot_Control_P...
-----Original Message to Facebook-----
From: kha****@hotmail.com
To:
Subject: post to facebook users wall .
Name: Ḱhalil
E-Mail: khal****@hotmail.com
Type: privacy
Scope: www
Description: dear facebook team .
my name is khalil shreateh.
i finished school with B.A degree in Infromation Systems .
i would like to report a bug in your main site
(www.facebook.com) which i discovered it .
repro:
the bug allow facebook users to share links to other
facebook users , i tested it on sarah.goodin wall and i
got success post
link - > https://www.facebook.com/10151857333098885
-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
From that, you surmised that he exploited the "make a new wall post" form by replacing the user ID with another of his choosing?That's not touching on the rest of your posts. They've all been hyperbolic bullshit, and I hate seeing it bleed over from the political discussions.
Which leads me to believe most people commenting are not doing so with an actual understanding of the situation, and are instead viewing this solely as Big Bad Facebook vs innocent hacker.
No, author, Go had very little to do with your page load times. Both Go and Django are going to serve a simple blog at the same speeds.
Just thought those two sentences were funny being right next to each other.
Let's be honest here, though: The percentage of people using his email service for illegal reasons is much higher than the percentage of people using roads for the same illegal reasons. It's the same problem that Pastebin faces,[0] and it's the reason paste.pocoo.org shut down.[1] Services that advertise complete privacy and anonymity get swamped with people who want to hide illegal activity.
[0]: http://www.tgdaily.com/security-features/62490-pastebin-to-p...
2. A person who, in real terms, is unskilled, and cant
see it, despite thinking they have a 'talent'. The
person often makes inappropriate, obtuse, or
simplistic comments, to everyone elses amusement.
So you're saying he's really insulting the people who came up with the phrase "Sandwich Artist", not the people who hold it as a job title? Because that's ridiculous. He used the phrase "Sandwich Artist" to evoke the image of an unskilled person who thinks they're much more important than they think they are. It comes from the fact that Subway employees are called "Sandwich Artists", despite their job being much the same as any other fast food server.It does not take a degree in linguistics to understand that using someone else's job title in a derogatory manner is shitting on the person with the job title. This is something you should have learned in grade school.
> I could re-use your comment to put down any criticism of any change of any kind.
Sure, if my criticism was about something that naturally changes. If I were criticizing trees for losing their leaves, or tides from moving in and out, or potato chips for going stale, you would be completely correct to tell me, "All of those things happen whether you like it or not." Just like I'm correct to tell you, "It's pointless to complain about words finding new meanings."
In short, everything you've said is completely wrong.
The best way for coupon code boxes to stop appearing is for developers and designers to bring it up with their client. A lot of the time, once the client is actually confronted with it has to make a decision, they choose not to have it.
You might want to rethink some things.
...See how ridiculous that sounds? If you understood what the author was saying, there's no need to nitpick his use of a single word. Languages change, bud. No amount of bitter internet comments will stop that.
And let's stop shitting on people who work at Subway, kay? Pretty sure they're doing more with their lives than someone who trolls HN to complain about nonsense.
Saying it's the fault of religion doesn't help solve anything. It's individuals who decide to interpret the Bible in ways that harm women, just like other individuals can consider themselves Christian, or Muslim, or Jewish, and still support women's right to birth control.
Of course, you won't see the story about a federal judge ruling NYPD's stop-and-frisk was illegal[0], despite it being a much graver offense to individual rights, because it doesn't affect rich, white techies. But an email service you never used shut down and cited "NSA did it!" as its reason? Put that shit all over the front page!
[0]: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/nyregion/stop-and-frisk-pr...
“When I returned to France to treat genital mutilation, I
was amazed that they were never tried. The medical
literature tells us the truth about our contempt for
women. For three centuries, there are thousands of
references to penile surgery, nothing on the clitoris,
except for some cancers or dermatology -and nothing to
restore its sensitivity. The very existence of an organ
of pleasure is denied, medically. Today, if you look at
the anatomy books that all surgeons have, you will find
two pages above. There is a real intellectual excision.“
No doubt someone will try to nitpick it, saying something like, "Well <inconsequential part of a man's body> wasn't documented until <year slightly earlier than 2009> so I don't see why it's such a big deal!"The fact of the matter is, though, that a body part crucial to a woman's sexual pleasure wasn't even properly documented until 2009, while a pill released solely to make men have more sex was put on the market 10 years earlier.[0] In a world where 140 million women have experienced genital mutilation,[1] and women are still shamed for having any sort of sexual experience[2] to the point where politicians[3] and even pharmacists[4] want to ban birth control, there's no way that's not indicative of a problem our culture still has regarding female sexuality.
[0]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sildenafil
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation
[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming
[3]: http://www.care2.com/causes/after-banning-almost-all-abortio...
[4]: http://www.prevention.com/health/healthy-living/new-birth-co...
Edit: Of course this story disappears off the front page. Oh sure, an article about a 1912 school test and yet another log on the NSA hate fire sit up at #1 and #3 respectively, but God forbid someone posts about female genitalia. Really just proving the point.