1,141 karma · joined February 17, 2014
The process described in this article ("Membrane Distillation") seems like a hybridisation of the two techniques and the researchers have found a way to improve efficiency by concentrating heat using lenses. Why can't this concentration of heat be used in straightforward distillation and why does distillation always seem to come in second best in terms of efficiency compared to the use of membranes? Is it because of the large surface area required?
Again, thanks HN for the overwhelming response.
Two full screen popup ads: tab closed, never visiting that domain again, back to HN to warn the others.
Babylonbee seem to be doing a good job of spreading FBs transgressions via satire: http://babylonbee.com/news/mark-zuckerberg-promises-to-do-be...
Perhaps I'm nitpicking but its worth noting that Haast Pass was opened in '65 and Dunedin to Queenstown takes 3.5 hrs without breaking the speed limit.
But yeah, flying cars would be a boon for many parts of Nuw Zulund
Am in business with someone many years older than me. It has always struck me how little tolerance he has for risks to my safety. The natural reaction is to have more lenience for situations that wont directly impact your personal safety. Wheras this guy will do potentially dangerous tasks that would otherwise be my responsibility. His kids are grown up, mine are young.
It is the kind of attitude that would be near impossible to enshrine in a larger organisation (like NASA) but refreshing to see all the same.
No talk about molecules necessary - just don't do stuff you don't need to do. Sure it takes a lot of planning to achieve but its been a standard concept around getting the job done for, I would say, millennia...
Either way, its often worth a good shot, hence the need to try radically worthwhile stuff like space travel and transitioning to sustainable energy.
If I were betting it all on disrupting the nail polish industry I doubt I would have the commitment to see it through. Being committed to something that will change the outcomes for my children's children will naturally gather a lot more effort from me.
"....but I shouldn't have to pay these exorbitant fees - I didnt drop it in water...."
"Yes you did"
Them: "You dropped it in water didn't you?"
Me: "No, I didn't"
Them: "Yes, you did"
Me: "Nope"
Them: "Yep"
Me: "Nope" .......
They've simply extrapolated on this capability to make the headline more clickable
Translation: we developed better compression algos for uploading your personal data to our servers
If AI never has a concept of "self" does it decrease the likelihood of it becoming self-protective?
What does perception of self even mean to us as humans and how could we be sure that a machine couldn't attain it?
Just because we can't see a means doesn't mean there isn't one.
Or am I missing your point?
Seems hopeful considering we can't ring fence internet users into the places we hope they'll stay without them breaking into systems that they shouldn't - and they dont have the computational power, sheer logic or persistence of an AI...
Regarding "losing control", what if we built a real big EMP device with a switch we could flip to fry every electrical device on the planet? We'd be plunged back into the dark ages but at least humanity would survive.
Further reading that helped along that journey: 1) Mere Christianity by CS Lewis 2) The Reason For God by Tim Keller 3) Anything by John Lennox 4) Many discussions by Ravi Zacharias
Regardless, this is not me attempting to invalidate all the points already made to the contrary, but an attempt to point out that belief in the bible isnt the most rediculous thing concievable and there are thoughtful, scientific people who identify as Christian, are not republican, trump-supporting or homophobic. Example: Francis Collins, leader of the Human Genome Project
You can take many individual parts of the Bible out of context and make it sound like madness but reading the whole in its entirety has a narrative that many miss.
For those raised on the internet and faster gratification (like me), try The Jesus Storybook Bible which I personally think is a great effort at paraphrasing the original.
EDIT: clarity
The fact that they try to force me to install their messenger app by making messaging through a mobile browser difficult is particularly infuriating and reveals how much they have their intentions at centre and not the benefit of their users/products/suckers (whatever you want to call us) now that they have the critical mass that people like me don't leave because everyone else is on it.
How do you measure the great things we already have and value that aren't so easily shown on a balance sheet and can't be shown on an emotive graph that trends up towards the right hand side?
The voter supported political agenda (whichever party it comes from) seems to often involve economic activities that don't hold to the long term values of the average Kiwi or the things that the rest of the world love our country for but we're temporarily blinded by the prospect of a shiny new car so make concessions in the short term.
I love the fact that so many people want to come and enjoy our home, but please understand that NZ is this way at least in part because we haven't focussed on growth at all costs. It may not always be this way.