You can literally pull every single conversation private or not from Slack with a button push or email request. The company owns all that data. There doesn't appear to be anything special about how Teams does data retention from my perspective.
And you can federate the two slack instances as well as a separate firewall without having to create multiple accounts for the same users to access multiple instances.
I'm an admin of both Slack and Teams. Almost all of this is due to how his org configured Teams. While there's some valid complaints, a lot of this comes down to IT not understanding the needs of their users or simply not caring about the needs of their users because of some stupid opaque management decisions. You can mute chats same as on Slack. You can be forced to autojoin same as in Slack. I have regular meetings with customers in Teams. While Slack is absolutely still better at what it does most of his horrible experience comes down to crappy settings by his IT. The mobile device integration is truly abysmal though. Hoping in apps requires you to install those apps as well to do simple things like project management. The whole point of hooking in an app is to not have to go directly to said app. We haven't had a problem with notifications either. Most of what's possible in locking down Teams is possible to do it Slack it's just not default.
Plenty of people with less financial stability than yourself are parents and do just fine. The most important part, more than any other advice is to just show up. A lot of people overestimate what it takes to be a good parent. Be there, be present, and the rest tends to fall into place.
There were also physical backups in case the automated ejection system didn't work. There was always a physical backup to any touch interface that was critical to system operations.
Yeah before founders started screwing employees by doing exactly what you said it was an option. Equal risk for high reward. Now it's higher risk for the employee for almost no guarantee of reward and a bait and switch at the last moment. My last two startups one paid out a whopping $0 for stock and the other went under.
Yeah... Mac is so clean that's why everything regarding transferring devices is such a PITA. It takes hours to figure out the arcane undocumented ways to fix whatever's broken on a Mac because they internationally hide or break their own devices. Seriously you can't even replace hard drives anymore on a Mac. Here's a fun one, try transferring family sharing to a new owner because say the previous owner died without losing everything. Try moving a child without access to the previous owners device, or even dropping the child from family sharing. Everything iOS user management related just plain sucks. I'm glad they're finally fixing the hot mess that is iTunes. Working on iOS or Mac is closer to bring a techpriest than a techie, understand nothing just chant the magic words. Give me Windows or Arch Linux any day of the week. I'm actually pretty sad the Ubuntu phone stopped being developed.
To be clear regarding multiple computers and servers so doesn't chocolatey, which is the the actual name of the app the parent post is using choco is the call to the package manager. I'm a little worried about bypassing UAC on Windows with Scoop but it's always good to have options.
Yeah there's definitely sites that flat out don't work in Firefox for no good reason. If you're intentionally breaking your site in this day and age I probably don't want to actually visit your site. Oddly enough I've jumped back to IE a few times to get some banking sites working.
And every one of them has been getting paid less and less each year Uber has existed to there point that some of them can't take care of their own families. I don't think anyone has a problem with the service, consumers are just getting tired of subsidizing the wealthy through taxation policies that advantage people who already have money and low wages across numerous verticals.
So am I understanding you're saying that even in their best performing division where they drastically underpay they are losing $22m a quarter and this is good news? I am honestly asking, as I'm not super familiar with their finances.
This is a terribly laid out argument. It's not kill the Germans/Japanese/Vietnamese. Hell in Vietnam we had Vietnamese allies. In Okinawa we routinely tried to stop civilians from committing suicide. There's a massive, massive difference between calling for erasing an entire people simply for existing and fighting a declared military force. No one in the US is going over to wipe out all Arabs, they are going to protect civilians and our own people under a strict set of rules of engagement meant to minimize civilian and not combatant casualties. These people are advocating violence against a people who don't even know they exist or have no defined I'll will against them. You're also conflating government protections for free speech and requirements to support said speech by civilians. No one has to provide your microphone to tell through. The mail will still deliver their racist pamphlets, they can still shout their horrors in public spaces. They don't have a right to have their hate hosted online.
China is doing exactly what you say with islands in the Pacific that they promised not to militarize and then moved in military bases. There balance of military power hasn't tipped at all, the western countries just stopped thinking it was okay to establish permanent settlements in other people's countries and then use that to claim we owned it. We still create best permanent military bases when we want to. If Britain or the US wanted we could destroy the Chinese Navy and Air Force without blinking. It's only when you get to ground forces that you see any kind of advantage in the Chinese military, because like the USSR in WW2 there are always more bodies.
The idea that China will ascend without having to change seems silly to me too. Either the great firewall will come down or the country will stagnate. Economics and sociology doesn't change simply because the government says it does. China is either due for a massive correction or another civil war. People will only take being oppressed for so long and generally they stop taking crap from their government when things are getting better not worse. How things shake out in Hong Kong are going to echo through China.
It's cultural. There's a serious adherence to the phrase let the buyer beware, however it's almost impossible to solve locally because if you acknowledge a problem you're apparently responsible for fixing it or you can be disappeared if it makes the country look bad. China is a very unique country with interesting sets of values. The whole global recycling chain got upended because a movie in China showed how nasty and harmful the recycling process is for low end plastics and metals which embarrassed the country. I remember there was an official who got in trouble for smiling at an inappropriate time. Almost everything is about appearance, much like the US early in it's ascendancy. China will eventually change when it's in their best interest to protect other people, it's not as if the US doesn't do very similar things to some of it's allies. Just look at the chicken tax or Canadian business suits for example. It's just in our best interest to enforce IP law currently because we own some of the most valuable IP. We over protect a ton of it too. That's nothing compared to our blatantly excessive copyright laws. Simply put it massive rent seeking behavior on the part of the US. As far as devaluing their currency, it's one of the few cards they have to play but it will hurt them in the long run as it means their foreign investments will lose value unless it's in real estate.
On the flip side I watched a poor tech person at Walmart trying to explain to a customer that while he was having an issue with an application, it was not grounds for return. It was also apparently not an issue he could work to fix.
I've got a great friend who's in the police service. They aren't all mediocre, but there's an awful lot of them and bad apples rightly get a lot of attention. I think the problem with policing is that it's been disproven that it's just a few bad apples, and that they forget the adage is that a single bad apple spoils the bunch. There's also very little public accountability for bad policing, which is the opposite of what it should be, punishments should be public just like their promotions and commendations are. If people were seeing actual bad policing getting punished appropriately there would be less outcry. You also can't take back killing someone.
I run a support group and the amount of terrible it is to get people not in support to recognize that taking care of our customers is not trivial. We ship a lot of software releases and at one point took to QAing the software before release as best we could become it would mean we'd get less support calls. Then they started shipping the software regardless of bugs because shipping bad software to meet the promised release dates was more important than releasing good code.
What most likely happened wasn't that they were overcharged, but that they dried out and expanded. He probably just needed to clean his terminals and put in fresh batteries. That doesn't just happen overnight. Either that or he tried to recharge non rechargable batteries.
And yet, if you take the Olsen twins at face value, they've had successful primary careers, have managed to hold on to their money, generally stay out of the spotlight, and have had numerous business ventures with varying levels of success. I don't think that the Olsen twins can be judged too harshly, in fact they really deserve quite a bit of credit for taking a single acting role and turning it into a lifelong empire. If they were in tech they'd be HN rock stars.
What's to say the article wasn't nonsensical? It's generally a listicle of platitudes that doesn't really go deep into anything. You could summarize most of it in one sentence. Professionals look at long term consequences and constantly challenge their own biases by accepting outside commentary and criticism. That sentence encompasses most of the article. I generally expect higher quality from FS, the article on second level thinking it links to is a better example of their usual content.
Eh won't go that far myself. I'm here because I've gotten a lot of help along the way when I've really needed it. I just try to give back in whatever way I can with the time I have left. I have good days and bad days still. It's just about not letting the bad days be more than the good days.
We were rather shocked as well. We were close enough that at one point we helped them pay their mortgage when they were struggling one month and had to choose between feeding their kids and paying for their house. It wasn't a huge mortgage and we were single and doing very well at the time so it wasn't like we were saints, but we thought we were good friends. Then the wife, who never worked, had a mid life crisis and things went wildly downhill fast. We used to have an awesome little dead end street too. Oh well.
Knowing what to measure against is harder the higher you go up the corporate ladder.
Incentives get skewed towards short term employees and short term rewards. Companies treating their employees as resources has only hurt loyalty. No one starts at a company in the US anymore unless they're average or below workers. The whole idea of companies not being willing to pay existing employees what they would pay a new hire is stupid too. You're willing to pay more for someone you're going to have to train and is a literal risk, versus a known commodity with known output. Generally you pay more for stability on the market not less.
Your opinion of TikTok is most likely due to your personal lens. With a 60 second time limit though the app there's very little time for thoughtful commentary unless you make the video elsewhere and import it. It's closer to a meme generator than a video hosting site, which makes the loss of creators even more problematic. Creators are willing to jump through hoops for less YouTube issues.
I know their contentID and copyright system is hopelessly broken and biased towards stealing from original content creators at the behest if established and larger publishers and this has been a real thorn in the side. Someone literally posted random white noise and it was claimed by multiple people automatically within seconds. That's a failure on YouTube's part that borders on facilitating cooyfraud. I'm surprised they haven't been sure over it yet.
There is no fiduciary requirement to put profits above all else. In fact there is no fiduciary duty to make profits, just basically to do what's best for the company. There is no short term time frame listed. If there is a requirement to make profits it's not because it's a responsibility. Shareholders may want it but no one gets punished if a bad decision for the long term success of the company doesn't pan out. There's numberous examples of CEOs that attempted to pivot when it wasn't the most profitable course of events and then receiving a nice severance more than most employees make in a lifetime of work for failing.
And you're how the system should work. I grew up to middle class parents but was largely in the same situation, except my parents had nothing to help with. Multiple bankruptcies, a failed business, and marital problems eventually led to my childhood home being foreclosed on. I've seen both wealthy and poor alike game the system. It's frustrating, especially when the hard times are from their own poor decision making. One family I knew could have entirely paid off their home, bought a modest used vehicle the desperately needed, and saved some money for college. They blew it on giving it away to friends and family vacations. Their car fell apart and their home was foreclosed on, their children were forced to drop out of college all because they made poor decisions and refused any attempts at listening to the warning we tried to offer then that they were making poor decisions. These were people below the poverty line. If they'd waited a single year they would have been able to have it all with what they and from paying off their mortgage.
By no means am I claiming to be perfect financially. We moved before we were ready because the neighbors we'd previously been close with became resentful as our financial situation improved beyond theirs. They would do really insane things, burning trash in their yards immediately after we washed our cars to get our cars covered in ash, putting a floodlight directly into our bedroom that would go off randomly at night, blocking our driveway. We bought a house below what we could have in a moderately nice, but not upscale neighborhood. It took us months of searching for the right house. I have to drive a bit farther for work when I can't work from home, but saving thousands a year in mortgage payments and living in what we've made our dream home is worth it to us.
People like you are what makes the system better. Putting in the work and earning it. I bet you're awesome at what you do.