>CSAM is a real problem.
It's is not nearly as big a problem as states wanting to oppress people.
6,970 karma · joined March 29, 2008
https://github.com/cabalamat/catwiki_p3
It's is not nearly as big a problem as states wanting to oppress people.
Yes, but not accidentally. You should press an [Edit] button which would take you to another URL to edit the page.
Any online forum will just become full of crap without moderation. So moderation is a necessity. And shadowbans are a sometimes-efffective tool of moderation.
How then, to prevent abuse of power? One possibility would be to allow multiple competing groups of moderators on the same forum and everyone allowed to sign up fro whichever moderation group(s) they prefer. Then if the "official" moderators start behaving unreasonably, people will simply vote with their feet and use different ones.
Really? That's the first time I've heard that (and I've worked on vehicle routing).
Normally, the driver would get the next address they have to visit and would use satnav to work out how to get there. They don't need to "comprehend" the overall route.
How easy is it to run it, though? Could I run GPT4 (or other LLMs) on a PC with a GPU, or would I need a datacenter? If the latter, many people will prefer a managed solution.
If its goal was to minimise human deaths, it might just kill everyone.
Maybe there should be an AI that produces optimally-readable/understandable programs? That's what I would want if I was adding the output to a codebase.
An idea: Twitter has lots of users, maybe Elon could build Reddit-like features into it.
Going off at a tangent, is there a reason WebAssembly can't interact with the DOM? I would have thought that being able to do so would be kinda useful, particularly in a web page.
Which has the added benefit of plausible deniability.
Am I the only person who thinks that looks ugly? I initially misread it as a typo for 17*n.
In Python it would just be 17. Python knows when an int is a bigint, because it is big.
It can also write non-trivial code that works. There's a saying "if you can't code it, you don't know it". Conversely, if you can code it, you do understand it, at some functional level.
For some use cases you don't need quality. E.g. where I live there's a free newspaper, the Metro, given out on buses/trains. The articles only exist to get people to read the ads. Most of the articles could probably just as well be written by AI. For all I know, some already are.
But some use cases do need quality, and quality will remain.
I could make all this computer controlled over a home server if I wanted to, but what's the point?
This could never happen, as the forbidden truths are forbidden because they have negative emotional impact, which would still be the case.
I do not, nor will I ever use, any "smart" device. "Smart" devices are
- unnecessarily complicated
- privacy destroying
- overpriced
- vendor lock-in
- often infected with online ads you can't get rid of
- likely to stop working if the vendor goes bust, their business model changes, or they just feel like it
IMO, it is rarely or never a smart decision to get a "smart" device.
> NaN == NaN
false
If you're a US worker you have an interest in workers in other countries being well paid, so that that they do not undercut you on price.
> China in particular violently suppresses unions
True
> because they believed it'll result in China outcompeting all other developing countries in manufacturing
I suspect the main reason is that independent unions would represent a separate locus of power, which would be a threat to the Communist party's rule.