though it seems a little strange that the name of the endpoint would be repeated three times across the URL (including domain name), it looks like CLR stands for "call log retrieval"
if you open any of the links for Minecraft, TARDIS, or Zelda, you'll see there's a gigantic banner placed by BreezeWiki that directs you to the new wikis. unless you mean that the links themselves are bad for SEO, which is unlikely
how do you think they managed to write the parser without access to the spec then? clearly OP knew about the public document. instead it seems like they're referring to some weird private superset of the format that wasn't publicly available
even if you were infringing on Valve's copyrights (which you probably aren't, you're just using one of their trademarks), licensing your project or not wouldn't change that at all. but more importantly, by not including a license file in your repository, you are asking everyone to assume that your project is not licensed, therefore all rights are reserved, therefore it's not actually open-source (a comment on HN is sadly not enough): https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-reposi....
> We decided to avoid using “free” or “libre” in the name ... Projects like Blender, Krita, or Godot are awesome, and they don’t need to convince you about their libre nature by putting it in their names.
so... we decided to add the name of the programming language we use instead?
the rules aren't based on the formats, but on a small portion of them (their magic numbers). this makes them inaccurate (think docx vs zip) and heuristic.