buzzerbetrayed

I wish Google didn’t give up up everything they try. Google plus was cool.

Because cars?

I'm not entirely sure I understand exactly what you're suggesting. But I'd imagine it's because a company that doesn't have to pay people will out compete the company that does.

There could be some scenario where it is advantageous to have humans working with AI. But if that isn't how reality plays out then companies won't be able to afford to pay people.

When you put distracting things on your homepage, don't be surprised when they're distracting

Some say hand wavy where others say dishonest. You’re justifying their dishonesty because telling the truth would cost them customers.

Gross.

> Beneficial to both parties

Ah yes, because who doesn’t want more emails from a sites they’ve visited one time

Have you learned the language? Expecting to know what’s going on without having learned the syntax is a bit silly

No, because playwright can be detected pretty easily and blocked. It needs to be (and will be) using the same browser that you regularly browse with.

He’s not a government employee. You said it yourself lol

> if it was better it would have survived.

Not sure how you can claim this when:

1. It is still very much alive, and

2. The whole point GP is making is that what made it better got stripped from it because of the acquisition announcement

Totally depends on what “better” means to you and your use case.

Not to mention that the necessity of "do a test transfer" already shows how massively broken the process is

You legitimately have it completely backwards. The word "piracy" was coopted to put a more severe spin on copyright violation. As a result, it became "the common usage of the word". But that was by design. And it's worth pushing back on.

So.. America can't protect American interests when deciding who should be in the country? If I went to Mexico and started protesting I would fully expect Mexico to send me home. And I'd support their right to do so.

This is a perfect example of the problem with media reporting bullshit and then later correcting it. Everyone hears the bullshit, very few people hear the actual reason.

It amazes you that the popular viewpoint in America is also found on HN?

If you honestly think Iran is enriching uranium for clean energy, I have a bridge to sell you.

Maybe it has something to do with Israel being an ally and Iran sponsoring terrorism all over the region

Nobody is claiming otherwise. They’re just pointing out that this isn’t what people are asking about when they ask if it has ads. You, like GGP, are being pedantic.

Not all software is used hours a day. Some software needs to be intuitive so the user doesn’t need to invest hours to learn it. And visuals play a huge part in that.

Ive wasn't great. Apple has only improved since he left. There, does it help if I say it more directly?

Just look it up. It was a thing for years, to the point that Apple was basically forced to revert it.

Can you clarify what you mean here? Are you saying I can use Claude Code for a flat rate of $100/month? What are the limits? What if I use more than $100 worth of Code in a month? Their website doesn't seem to make it clear.

Edit:

Found the answer to my own questions

> Send approximately 50-200 prompts with Claude Code every 5 hours[1]

Damn. That's a really good deal

[1] https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/11145838-using-cla...

"anyone who arrives at the conclusion you have arrived at is a lunatic" is functionally the same as "you're a lunatic so your opinion is invalid". Nitpick all you want.

No. It's saying that personal attacks that are meant to undermine the credibility of your opponent is ad hominem. Because it is.

You’re saying the same thing twice. One just more blatantly than the other. The point of calling someone a lunatic is to undermine their opinion. It’s ad hominem either way even if one is more subtle.

Yep. I suspect GP has just gotten used to this and it is the new “snappy” to them.

I see this all the time with people who have old computers.

“My computer is really fast. I have no need to upgrade”

I press cmd+tab and watch it take 5 seconds to switch to the next window.

That’s a real life interaction I had with my parents in the past month. People just don’t know what they’re missing out on if they aren’t using it daily.

As someone who likely never would have bought a windows phone, I sure wish Microsoft would have stuck with it

Delaying the enforcement to July makes you right?

Aren’t mortgages the number one reason houses cost so much? If mortgages weren’t allowed, the price of houses would plummet.