brokensegue

The reason is personal preference. Same reason people buy sports cars. I also wish their preferences were different

Why wouldn't they have already been looking for a way to make their food more palatable? There was already a lot of money on the line

Because this is the language of the trump administration. Everything needs to be momentus. The good must always be beating an unknown and all powerful enemy

I don't think this particular discussion has to do with the idea of knowledge. We're discussing whether human experts had previously deciphered the sections

That isn't what the claim is about. I mean I don't think the source is particularly convincing but the claim is that it figured out the significance of the text not the literal meaning of the words

this isn't a peer reviewed journal article though. do you have expertise in the field to say whether an expert would be able to decipher this?

why?

ownership through funds shouldn't count

you can also do this with JPEGs. se my repo https://github.com/derenrich/hdr-steganography

Depression correlates with dementia. As do many drugs to treat various psychiatric conditions

What about this data https://innovationgraph.github.com/global-metrics/git-pushes

how do you quantitatively measure day-to-day quality? only thing i can think is A/B tests which take a while to evaluate

I don't know people are saying it's useful. Just interesting

yeah that's just a bad definition. nobody would describe painting for fun as "vanity". vanity metrics make sense because in business the goal is to make money. in life that is not the goal.

RCTs are expensive and sometimes possible. We do these studies first. The paper says

>Our study suggests the importance of further research investigating the role of coffee consumption in biological ageing.

i assumed nano banana was just a tool that gemini 3 used though i don't know

I never got value from him

they don't know that?

i don't know the answer but i'm curious why you want to know

sounds like you agree that when people say "AI" they aren't referring to the concept in a narrow sense.

I know what you're saying. But what you are describing isn't "AI". It isn't even "LLMs". It's one particular use of that technology.

I was trying to zoom in on exactly what people don't like.

Generating code will always be more performant and reliable than this. Just consider the security implications of this design...

or that just connected over usb and acted as a usb display adapter

I don't get your suggestion. How does the database tie into speech to text?

ketamine?

I don't get how this is the only comment that doubts how their proofs work. There is zero detail or explanation of what they are proving

it's the best way we've found so far?

i think you're comparing apples and oranges. that they have so far failed to steal any coins does not mean anything with regards to this discussion

stealing other data is less lucrative. i'm not confident someone could empty my bank account even with my username/password