brokensegue

you should link your data to wikidata which will get you free connection back to crunchbase and other sources e.g. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q97041185

You could even back some of the data from there

EU tried to ban tracking cookies. Anyone could've seen the result coming (every site now disrupts your reading). The defeatist attitude would've been right there.

I don't see how games won't just charge you a $0.01 "subscription" that lasts 5 years or various other such sidesteps. it'll just make everything more annoying.

anyone have a free photo for wikipedia?

Using mtp takes away some of the magic for me

i assumed it's for influencers who want to make a video of the new city or something

Amusingly you just conflated the pico (a dev board) with its chip (rp2040)

Then maybe caveat your posts with that

ah. I missed that.

were you involved in making the study? your bio says you work for them so you should probably indicate that in your comments.

lack of agreement when there is no singular correct answer (or any answer at all) isn't a useful metric

I ran into a lot of these kinds of issues when working on the Citation Needed WMF project (and related extensions). Truth is so often very nuanced.

yeah i really don't like the corpus of statements and it makes me doubt lenz. consider

> “Artificial intelligence will cause widespread job loss among software engineers.”

https://lenz.io/c/ai-software-engineers-job-loss-impact-05e4...

this is a statement about the future. who knows? dataset also includes

> Robots will not replace human teachers in schools in the near future.

or

> Papua New Guinea has very few female members of parliament.

what counts as very few?

> “Taurine supplementation supports mood and emotional health in humans.”

why is this labeled as misleading? i'm not even sure when I'm supposed to use the misleading label

> Anaximander was the first scientist in recorded history.

this is a judgement call as the term scientist didn't exist.

the claims that feel actually solidly answerable seem to have much better LLM performance

Most jeeps never go off-road

I think the problem isn't that people don't care. It's that checking is expensive. "Only $15" isn't trivial when there's tons of claims floating around. And even when you do it people return with complaints and you'll have to redo it (see the other comments here).

jython has been basically unmaintained for quite some time

Their variable cost is (basically) the number of tokens. They increased that. I don't get how that saves them money

You can freeze and concentrate a substance without chemically altering it

none of that is censorship

I think b/w film has a different grain than color. It isn't identical to grayscale color

many people do not think the science against them are credible. foods containing those things are staples of many diets.

i've tried it a few times and it's never really helped as much as i expected. though i know they've released a couple times since I last tried it.

genie is out of the bottle on this one

they used to claim that being Swiss based protected them from warrants like this

"classical ML" models typically have a more narrow range of applicability. in my mind the value of ollama is that you can easily download and swap-out different models with the same API. many of the models will be roughly interchangeable with tradeoffs you can compute.

if you're working on a fraud problem an open-source fraud model will probably be useless (if it even could exist). and if you own the entire training to inference pipeline i'm not sure what this offers? i guess you can easily swap the backends? maybe for ensembling?

Did you consider doing it as a computer use task? Probably I find those more compelling

It's what I did for my game benchmark https://d.erenrich.net/paperclip-bench/index.html

why not use a classification of food that actually aligns with what is bad? it seems like we don't actually know. Nova combines a bunch of different attributes some of which we don't actually think are causally linked to bad health.

nobody has a good definition of ultra-processed food

does he need spacex/xai to prop up tesla or the other way around?

analysts are kinda irrelevant when a stock isn't connected to fundamentals anyways

such tools cost 10-20/mo usually?

i'm a big fan of IA and wayback machine. i donate. but i do wish it were faster. i understand that would cost a lot more though.

i wonder if maybe donors above a certain level could get priority on archiving pages or something.

The reason is personal preference. Same reason people buy sports cars. I also wish their preferences were different