It took a while, with emails going unanswered for long periods at times.
3,777 karma · joined March 25, 2011
- Web: https://tonybox.net/
- Contact: https://tonybox.net/posts/contact/
- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tonyb486/
- Mail: hn@tonyb.xyz
- Phone: 347-708-6692
Opinions expressed are solely my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or clients.
I'm not your attorney, nothing on here is any of the following: legal advice, a legal opinion, or the opinion of my law firm.
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/tonyb486; my proof: https://keybase.io/tonyb486/sigs/8h0YhPavJMbSRHuXHdR5NgD6xpqJivdBhMWIaVsgjIo ]
It took a while, with emails going unanswered for long periods at times.
Using SIMD for making text into … uwu.
[1]: https://www.sf.gov/news/san-francisco-launches-new-departmen...
[2]: https://www.sf.gov/departments/child-care-health-program-cch...
[3]: https://provider.sfdec.org/ (linked as "Department of Early Childhood Provider Portal" in [2])
[1]: https://docs.python.org/3/library/subprocess.html#security-c...
Apple had the iPod - and, crucially, customers - could bring these customers to the carriers, and so they could dictate more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9_Vh9h3Ohw (the part I'm referencing is about 20 minutes in).
- A very recent version of liblzma5 - 5.6.0 or 5.6.1. This was added in the last month or so. If you're not on a rolling release distro, your version is probably older.
- A debian or RPM based distro of Linux on x86_64. In an apparent attempt to make reverse engineering harder, it does not seem to apply when built outside of deb or rpm packaging. It is also specific to Linux.
- Running OpenSSH sshd from systemd. OpenSSH as patched by some distros only pulls in libsystemd for logging functionality, which pulls in the compromised liblzma5.
Debian testing already has a version called '5.6.1+really5.4.5-1' that is really an older version 5.4, repackaged with a newer version to convince apt that it is in fact an upgrade.
It is possible there are other flaws or backdoors in liblzma5, though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4QGOHahiVM (Last Week Tonight with John Oliver)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQpUV--2Jao (Wendover Productions)
Even if you don’t use the app, if you just buy a double cheeseburger and a small fries it’s $3.99.
They're pushing their prices but there’s still cheap meals to be had.
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2022/01/fake-qr-codes...
"Ah," nodded Arthur, "is he. Is he."
First, I greedily requested 10,000 random numbers from xkcd with a script. These numbers are here so nobody need re-commit my deed: https://gist.github.com/tonyb486/0da38e7575071f241551d14101a...
Then, I filtered out all numbers 2048 and above so that I just had 11 bits of entropy from each number from [0,2048). I converted that to a stream of binary in ASCII, 11 bits per random number.
I fed that list of 78100 bits into STS, as 100 streams of 780 bits. It segfaulted, but it had already written out some results:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS FOR THE UNIFORMITY OF P-VALUES AND THE PROPORTION OF PASSING SEQUENCES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
generator is <xkcd.ascii>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 P-VALUE PROPORTION STATISTICAL TEST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13 15 7 9 7 6 9 11 17 6 0.137282 97/100 Frequency
13 5 10 12 11 7 4 10 12 16 0.191687 98/100 BlockFrequency
13 11 14 9 2 9 10 7 13 12 0.249284 97/100 CumulativeSums
11 10 12 11 1 10 9 15 8 13 0.181557 98/100 CumulativeSums
6 6 8 18 9 8 11 14 7 13 0.122325 99/100 Runs
16 7 6 12 13 9 7 14 9 7 0.275709 97/100 LongestRun
10 13 12 0 23 0 18 0 24 0 0.000000 * 99/100 FFT
Delightful.Why do we have due process? One key reason is that it gives people the opportunity to be heard. One could argue that being heard by an AI is no different from being heard by a human, just more efficient.
But why do people want the opportunity to be heard? It’s partly the obvious, to have a chance to defend oneself against unjust exercises of power, and of course against simple error. But it’s also so that one can feel heard and not powerless. If the exercise of justice requires either brutal force or broad consent, giving people the feeling of being heard and able to defend themselves encourages broad consent.
Being heard by an AI then has a brutal defect, it doesn’t make people feel heard. A big part of this may come from the idea that an AI cannot be held accountable if it is wrong or if it is acting unfairly.
Justice, then, becomes a force of nature. I think we like to pretend justice is a force of nature anyway, but it’s really not. It’s man-made.
Many of our criminal laws are written with the implicit assumption that it takes resources to investigate and prosecute a crime, and that this will limit the effective scope of the law. Prosecutorial discretion.
Putting aside for the moment the (very serious) injustice that comes with the inequitable use of prosecutorial discretion, let's imagine a world without this discretion. Perhaps it's contrived, but one could imagine AI making it at least possible. Even by the book as it's currently written, is it a better world?
Suddenly, an AI monitoring public activity can trigger an AI investigator to draft a warrant to be signed by an AI judge to approve the warrant and draft an opinion. One could argue that due process is had, and a record is available to the public showing that there was in fact probable cause for further investigation or even arrest.
Maybe a ticket just pops out of the wall like in Demolition Man, but listing in writing clearly articulated probable cause and well-presented evidence.
Investigating and prosecuting silly examples suddenly becomes possible. A CCTV camera catches someone finding a $20 bill on the street, and finds that they didn't report it on their tax return. The myriad of ways one can violate the CFAA. A passing mention of music piracy on a subway train can become an investigation and prosecution. Dilated pupils and a staggering gait could support a drug investigation. Heck, jaywalking tickets given out as though by speed camera. Who cares if the juice wasn't worth the squeeze when it's a cheap AI doing the squeezing.
Is this a better world, or have we just all subjected ourselves to a life hyper-analyzed by a motivated prosecutor.
Turning back in the general direction of reality, I'm aware that arguing "if we enforced all of our laws, it would be chaos" is more an indictment of our criminal justice system than it is of AI. I think that AI gives us a lens to imagine a world where we actually do that, however. And maybe thinking about it will help us build a better system.