HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

bondarchuk

4,270 karma · joined May 30, 2020

submissionscomments
bondarchuk··on Photoshop's challenges with focus, pt. 2
No it's just the contents of the dropdown menu (master red yellow green cyan blue magenta) split out into radio buttons.
bondarchuk··on Bad Connection: Global telecom exploitation by covert surveillance actors
>In the US this is legally required to be accurate to within 300 meters, so it comes from GPS or AGPS.

Does that mean GPS is used by the baseband chip even when I disable location services in the OS?

bondarchuk··on Where the goblins came from
There's no end to arguing with someone who claims they don't understand something, they could always just keep repeating "nevertheless I don't understand it"... You could keep shifting the goalposts for "real understanding" until one is required to hold the effects of every training iteration on every single parameter in their minds simultaneously. Obviously "we" understand some things (both low level and high level) to varying degrees and don't understand some others. To claim there is nothing left to know is silly but to claim that nothing is understood about high-level emergence is silly as well.
bondarchuk··on Online age verification is the hill to die on
>They are counting on you caring more about sounding reasonable than protecting your kids from a system designed to control them forever.
bondarchuk··on AI singer now occupies eleven spots on iTunes singles chart
You can listen to AI-generated music all you want, why does it bother you so that others won't?
bondarchuk··on We're pausing Asimov Press
https://www.asimov.press/about

>We are an editorially-independent part of [Asimov](https://www.asimov.com/).

It seems to be a vanity publication for some kind of genetic engineering company.

bondarchuk··on Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time
To someone who is shocked at the prevalence of female genital mutilation in other cultures, the widespread acceptance of other types of genital mutilation in (probably) their own culture is an important piece of context, I'd say.
bondarchuk··on Cuts in publishing and book reviewing imperil the future of narrative nonfiction
This was dead, I vouched for it, I think it's a good point. Form does not determine the truthfulness of content.
bondarchuk··on Pompeii's battle scars linked to an ancient 'machine gun'
From wikipedia it sounds like the advantage is not really speed of recharging but just that it will repeatedly fire for as long as the lever is turned without any other actions or pauses needed in between. Maybe not losing 10% (or whatever?) of the time on bolt feeding was sufficient advantage? Maybe the ease of operation in a hectic battle situation was advantage enough? Or maybe the continuous power requirement made it more feasible to use multiple soldiers at once working at higher speed, without them having to synchronize starting/stopping/waiting every x seconds?
bondarchuk··on Two pilots dead after plane and ground vehicle collide at LaGuardia
I think rahimnathwani's point was not that they get extra pay so it's fine, but that it seems economically irrational to overwork fewer staff if it's actually more expensive.
bondarchuk··on Books of the Century by Le Monde
Since you have no question I won't venture to answer. :D
bondarchuk··on Books of the Century by Le Monde
What is your question? If you just want to know why Ulysses is seen as influential you can start with the wikipedia article. If you want to try again to read it you can try to read it with a guide of some kind, there are multiple, I used this one https://www.ulyssesguide.com/1-telemachus.
bondarchuk··on A pig's brain has been frozen with its cellular activity locked in place
>I don't understand why people don't get this simple fact.

Some people think identity and the continuity of consciousness are based on information or computation, and not on specific physical matter or soul-like constructs, so for them a transfer of all relevant information would constitute a transfer of consciousness and identity. From this perspective (leaving aside questions of practicality) "you yourself looking from the biological body at somebody else in the computer" is exactly as valid as "you yourself looking from inside the computer at somebody else in the biological body" (and in fact the whole idea that you have to choose one or the other as "the real you" becomes moot on this view).

Of course it's a difficult metaphysical conundrum but to say that your view of things is "a simple fact" when the basic scientific materialist worldview of today points at least as much in the opposite direction is a bit overconfident.

bondarchuk··on 3M's PFAS exit killed the supply chain for two-phase immersion cooling in DCs
I'm just chiming in with the best of intentions to say that I also think you're misinterpreting some things in a way that would be much more effort to explain than you simply reading the article again with this in mind.
bondarchuk··on I'm OK being left behind, thanks
>I've never seen anything like it for a technically optional tool

If you broaden the comparison (only a little bit) it looks suspiciously like employees being forced to train their own replacement (be that other employees, or factory automation), a regular occurrence.

bondarchuk··on 3M's PFAS exit killed the supply chain for two-phase immersion cooling in DCs
>"3M did not make this call because they found a better product. They made it because they were [...]"

Ok yeah I guess you could be right..

bondarchuk··on 3M's PFAS exit killed the supply chain for two-phase immersion cooling in DCs
At least where I live the PFAS disaster is so widely known and publicized that I would say it's fair to leave it out of scope for this article. Oh and "who got hurt" - basically everyone worldwide for the foreseeable future.
bondarchuk··on Essex police pause facial recognition camera use after study finds racial bias
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_enforcement
bondarchuk··on Gitana 18: the new flying Ultim trimaran
I guess the situation with boats is the same as with land speed records? In the limit, the fastest boat simply becomes an airplane just touching the water.
bondarchuk··on Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act
Scott Alexander had a few posts about that ("why is there so little money in politics?"): https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/tech-pacs-are-closing-in-on...
bondarchuk··on Qatar helium shutdown puts chip supply chain on a two-week clock
Ah, sorry, this will not work, we are not capable of building new houses in any significant capacity. I don't know why but it's the reality.
bondarchuk··on Source code of Swedish e-government services has been leaked
It's also "anyone's brokerage account holdings, addresses, phone numbers" according to the comment that this subthread of the conversation is about.
bondarchuk··on Shall I implement it? No
Conscious and dumb are not mutually exclusive, as we can observe every day :)
bondarchuk··on Don't post generated/AI-edited comments. HN is for conversation between humans.
No thanks. Thankfully there is a policy against it now so I don't even have to convince you.
bondarchuk··on Don't post generated/AI-edited comments. HN is for conversation between humans
All the weak excuses posted here are just making me lean more towards a hardline policy. No I don't want to read a human-generated summary of your llm brainstorming session. No I don't want to read human-written text with wording changes suggested by an llm. No I don't want to read an excerpt from llm output even if you correctly attribute it.

I acknowledge this is partly just my personal bias, in some cases really not fair, and unenforceable anyway, but someone relying on llms just makes me feel like they have... bad taste in information curation, or something, and I'd rather just not interact with them at all.

bondarchuk··on Don't post generated/AI-edited comments. HN is for conversation between humans.
Yes it is different and I don't want to read it.
bondarchuk··on Living human brain cells play DOOM on a CL1 [video]
Yes, there's a difference between suffering that happens now, and potential suffering that happens in the future, caused by research being done now. I see many in this discussion (me included) have not made this distinction explicit in all their comments but I also think it should so be obvious that any counter-comment which appears to not understand that this distinction is being made implicitly is best explained as missing the point deliberately.

Anyway to reiterate my point upthread, there could be people who think a chicken-level entity suffering is permissible, and a human-level entity suffering is not, and it is a perfectly consistent moral position for them to say we should not do research into creating new kinds of human-level entities with the potential for suffering. The permissible suffering being in the present and the impermissible suffering being in the future does not really change that.

PS in this thread we were not only talking about computer programs, but artificial brains made from biological human neurons too.

bondarchuk··on Living human brain cells play DOOM on a CL1 [video]
>When aircraft can carry onboard oil refineries and drilling rigs you can more reasonably compare them to birds.

This is a fair point in general, but the whole point in this context is not that human design is more efficient at duplicating an entire organism, but that it can be more efficient at narrowly defined tasks. Evolution has never had the goal 'evolve human consciousness as quickly and efficiently as possible', it just had the goal (and even calling it that is stretching things of course, but let's say an emergent goal) of reproducing organisms.

bondarchuk··on Living human brain cells play DOOM on a CL1 [video]
Surely you can imagine that there are people who draw their ethical line for permissible suffering with animal farming on the "permissible" side and "slavery on an unimaginable scale" on the "not permissible" side? Imagine you or someone you love duplicated 5 million times and living through 1000 subjective years of pure existential horror (while doing menial industrial cognitive tasks). Some would say this is worse than eating meat.
bondarchuk··on Living human brain cells play DOOM on a CL1 [video]
>it's still not a sentient being

How do you know?

← PreviousPage 3 of 34Next →