38 karma · joined March 13, 2013
Chances are, if I wind up liking the app enough to pay, my wife would also, and I hate paying full price x2...
However the AR of pokémon go actually makes the game harder IMO, so it's only on in the rare instances I feel the need to take an in-game photo.
Also, pokego is a significant battery drain on my primary device. I feel like leaving the camera on all the time would just kill the battery faster. OTOH I don't really care if the 3d effect kills my 3ds faster. My gaming sessions aren't as mission critical as my phone battery.
It's a bit of a hassle for anyone who knows their way around linux, but Pis are marketed toward kids & other "normals". This is what happens to products designed for everyone.
The only thing that is as easy in apt as brew is installing packages.
Searching, getting info about a package, updating the list of available packages, are all much easier with homebrew.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Anecdata: Just over 250,000 on my 2007 Honda CRV and with $1k in unscheduled mechanical maintenance and around another $1k in non-mechanical maintenance.
Assuming a 10,000 mile oil change cycle (I only change the oil when the car recommends it, and it seems to avg about 10k miles) that's 25 oil changes so far, for a total of ~$1800 (assuming dealer oil change + full synthetic, which has been all but two of my oil changes so far; does not include tax).
Warning, opinions ahead: In my experience, most people do not follow the recommended preventative maintenance plans for their vehicles, and rely solely on oil, tires, and gas changes, and all three only when necessary.
Here be dragons: At an over-all average MPG (according to the car's own computer) of 25, I've spent more on fuel than the cost of the vehicle, including loan interest, in the 250,000 miles.
Getting waaaaay out there: 32k for car + interest, 35k in fuel, 10k in other scheduled work (I believe in preventative maintenance), upgrades, cleaning, etc for a total cost of ownership of about ~80k means I've paid ~$3/mile driven.
Clearly, someone at agile bits has given thought to defending against a compromised machine. Therefore, I don't see how you can justify not obfuscating data sent over lo0. I also fail to see how obfuscating the data sent over lo0 would "have unpleasant side effects that risk user data in other ways."
Uh, no, the first thing you do is run the test suite.