574 karma · joined May 31, 2020
I think you have a pretty big hurdle in the sign up and might be losing customers because of this. I would suggest allowing users to at least try it without signing up and also provide "Signup with Apple" instead of email.
Russiagate conspiracy
Ukraine hoax
Jussie Smollett hoax
Bubba Wallace hoax
Covington Catholic Highschool hoax
Kavanaugh hoax
Doesn't report majority of the facts of Epstein case fairly
Riots are called "peaceful protests"
Antifa is called a "myth"
Looking at the Wikileaks emails is called "illegal" by media
Now they wonder why Qanon is catching up?
EDIT: I am saying this as someone who thinks Qanon is bs. But the same people who spread misinformation for years now questioning the spread of a conspiracy theory is quite hypocritical. Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
The left keeps saying that but I have never understood why. Why would an "authoritarian" be defending people's right to bear arms (2A), their freedom of speech (1A), States rights (federalism 10A) etc. I would even go as far as to say that the left is the one which is authoritarian and simply enjoys name calling assigning labels to the right as described as a tactic by Saul Alinsky which also happens to be loved by Hillary and Obama.
Please research from non biased non spin news and look at actual documents unsealed.
Of course that comes with its on risks as Apple won't be able to control what apps get installed but if Google can do it, then so can Apple. This way Apple can keep their App Store guidelines consistent across all developers and developers who don't want to go through the sometimes tiresome review process plus give apple the 30% share, can use this alternate App Store.
Decent healthy food is not expensive. I have lived through it myself and plenty of us have.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf-k6qOfXz0
Now he's fully onboard with open border policies. He doesn't even have the same message he did 5 years ago. Just like his twitter history shows him tweeting about evil millionaires and billionaires until he became a millionaire himself and now only targets billionaires.
> In recent presidential cycles, the velocity of edits made to a Wikipedia page have correlated with the choice of vice presidential running mate
https://theintercept.com/2020/07/02/kamala-harris-wikipedia/
When the richest man in the US who happens to own the largest online shopping site and also uses his own newspaper to push more propaganda to push for more lockdowns - thus eliminating more competition from small businesses, is the richest man to be blamed or are the politicians listening to him and the people reading his propaganda newspaper and following orders to be blamed too?
When all the massive multi-national corporations that have questionable hiring, firing, healthcare, worker's rights, and safety track records promote and sponsor your cause and your Revolution has corporate sponsorship, you are not a revolutionary, you are a pawn.
It's just amazing how those who kept advocating for opening up small businesses and ending the lockdowns got called all sorts of names by the same people who complain about the rich getting richer.
Everyone who's willing to put a tiny bit of effort can get food and shelter thanks to food banks, shelters etc. Back in my country, we don't have that luxury yet but a lot of religious places are trying their best at providing that.
I am not religious myself but I do think they should play an important role at feeding those who don't have the resources yet.
Once your basic necessity like food and water have been solved, it's up to you to work your way up.
So no, it's not just a bumpersticker retort. Growing up in a poor south asian country, I was taught to only care about the food on my plate and not be jealous of the food on someone else's plate. That made me work hard at putting more food on my own plate without being jealous and stealing from another's plate.
2. A stock price going up is not exactly getting "richer".
That's such an asinine and patronizing comment. People need to stop treating us minorities as some stupid and incapable people. Every single adult is capable of getting a photo ID - if they can be bothered to vote, they can be bothered to spend a few minutes getting a photo ID.
The real reason people oppose voter ID is because democrats won't be able to cheat. Voting is enshrined in the constitution as a fundamental right but cheating is not enshrined.
Also interesting how all 3 sources you linked are from radical left to left leaning sources.