blactuary

Incumbent owners preventing the construction of more supply to maintain their own property values is not "free market". This is very basic stuff

enjoy the taste of Mark's boot

He's on the AI beat, if he is unaware that a chatbot will fabricate quotes and didn't verify them that is a level of reckless incompetence that warrants firing

It's not off topic to point out that the company being discussed is evil and should be put out of business

Some companies have enough of a track record that they should be nuked from orbit, and "Company bad" is all that is worth saying. Meta is one of those companies. Palantir is another. Not holding them accountable and acting as if we should continue engaging with their products is part of the reason we are rapidly sliding towards dystopia

He "learned" by illegally poisoning black people

> an engineering and physics problem that he will somehow solve

no he won't

Yes exactly. Way too many people who ought to know better are like "this is cool!" and when disaster happens are going to have egg on their face

If they want to abandon noblesse oblige we can certainly go back to the old way of evening things out. Their choice

Wtf are you talking about? I didn't link any article

And no I will not question the claim. What is wrong with you?

No, I do not. I literally said "I have absolutely no insight into this instance"

A woman claimed she was raped by her partner. She left that partner some time later. You questioned it because she didn't leave him immediately and left him after allegations of cheating, completely ignoring the complexity of being in an abusive relationship, and expressing skepticism of the woman for not immediately leaving him. That is really shameful and gross to do.

And even here you are expressing skepticism "Tell me what difficulty she had". You clearly are out of your depth here, clearly ignorant about the dynamics of abuse, and are saying some really nasty stuff about a woman you know nothing about, and now digging in your heels when it's pointed out. You have no place to question anything about this woman's relationship.

You did not just ask a question. You said:

> So she didn't have any problems "escaping" the relationship.

It has nothing to do with reading another article and I have absolutely no insight into this instance and neither do you. You do not and cannot know what is going on in that woman's life to judge her like that, and it's really gross to try and do so.

So he was willing to make a business deal with the country that executes gay people, as long as HE wasn't in danger? Legitimizing their regime is perfectly OK if it doesn't affect him? The fact that he was negotiating with them makes that incident look even worse for him, not Gawker

This is gross man. Abusive relationships are way more complicated than that, judging someone in this situation because you read one article about it is out of line

Yes it does, when she was the one recruiting people to participate.

Are you suggesting there is something inherent to being Somali that means they are more likely to commit fraud?

What other fraud? The Feeding Our Future fraud is the biggest case and they got caught and prosecuted. 80 people have been convicted

And the ringleader of the fraud was a white woman who is awaiting sentencing, but they ignore that part

Here is an agent arresting a US citizen, for the expressed reason of having an accent. What is the perspective and motivation here?

https://bsky.app/profile/premthakker.bsky.social/post/3mcnjw...

> I'm not trying to defend or justify

Yes you are, when you say things like this:

> those ICE agents have a perspective, they have motivations, they're people

They are racist, fascist thugs, it's that simple. They want to terrorize immigrants and brown people. There is no need to overthink this. They are racially profiling people every day, and arresting citizens because they are minorities. They shot a mother in the head and now they are telling the rest of us "didn't you learn your lesson?", alluding to that murder. They tear-gassed a family of 6 trying to get home the other day, including a 6 month old baby that lost consciousness. The family had nothing to do with anything, they were simply trying to get home in an area ICE was attacking.

What "perspective" could possibly change anything about this shameful behavior?

What is the unbiased view of a federal agency geared up for war kidnapping and terrorizing people in the streets of American city? You have no idea what it's like here right now.

We're not passive, they would shoot us in the head

Is this "enforcing immigration policy"? https://bsky.app/profile/dominicervolina.com/post/3mc3b6soa2...

Nonsense. They are targeting people who are here legally. Cancelling their asylum applications while they are in the legal process and then arresting them at court, when they are following all of the rules.

There are also millions of people who were brought here as babies or young children, through no fault of their own, and who have no ties whatsoever to the country where they were born. There should be a process to fix that, sending them to a faraway country they have never lived is disgusting.

At every turn Republicans have fought any attempt to find sensible solutions because they want to wield "they are here illegally!" as a cudgel, and they have fooled people like you

There was no deadly force from the driver, you either haven't watched the video or you are incredibly dishonest

Absolute nonsense

And if it were true that he was at risk of being hurt by the car, shooting the driver would be the last thing to do. Look what happened when he shot her, she lost control, accelerated, and ran into a parked car

[flagged]

from his kiddie porn website, keep defending him though

What happened man you got really quiet

It is literally in there twice, what the hell are you talking about?

This is amazing. You are tripling down despite being unequivocally wrong. Just incredible

"We’ll see how it shapes up in the next few years. But if the racists or the other racists are still running the show, we really are just cooked."

Ready to retract everything now? I gave you multiple chances to correct your error.

I expected this was all bad faith, I do appreciate you confirming it directly, and again verifying you did not even read the first link I posted