alias proj="cd /this/that/foo/projects/myproject/ && source .hsenv/bin/activate"406 karma · joined April 23, 2012
alias proj="cd /this/that/foo/projects/myproject/ && source .hsenv/bin/activate"For example, I might use Elixir if I was trying to onboard Rubyists to a project on the Erlang VM or Haskell if I was building out an API with Riak (because I know the Riak client in Haskell is awesome and digestive-functors is nice to work with).
As for deciding to use (ie: play with) on the side. I'll try pretty much anything (J/Julia/mocl/Erlang/agda) if a project sufficiently captures my interest regardless of community/syntax/tooling/etc.
I own Glass and I am not an asshole (afaik) about it nor do I wish to be perceived as one. I've met a bunch of other Glass users with whom I've brought this up in a similar way to: "Why do you self-deprecatingly call yourself an asshole for wearing Glass?" and as far as I know they stop, but that may just be them not doing it around me.
Do other Glass users feel like they need to call themselves names? Is there something I'm missing/taking out of context? Do people without Glass have an opinion on this?
(An interesting and maybe relevant tidbit is that I was recently told "You make me feel poor" by someone who I was interacting with while wearing Glass)
For example, in my high school AP Calc class, I often couldn't stay awake because I picked up on the concepts very quickly whereas my peers did not and I would quickly get very bored when being lectured on the same topics day after day. Contrast that with the amount of books on Mathematics I currently own, that my favorite language is Haskell and that I currently am employed writing software.
It was almost as if my body had developed a heuristic for how useful today's class was going to be and reacted accordingly. The same sort of thing happened through college (Psych, Business, etc) whereas I was known to read psychology textbooks for fun when I was very young.
I can also use these phones one handed whereas I don't see most people doing that.
I've heard Tmo is good in cities from friends that use it, it's the non-city areas that you'd have to watch out for.
Erlang for me was a developing interest in distributed systems, which I think is of growing importance. The Riak source code, and associated projects, have been great for advancing towards such goals. Erlang the language is pretty easy to pick up and I've spent more time on distributed computing concepts than needing to parse out language details.
Haskell is my favorite language. I like it because it fits my mental models very well and I thoroughly enjoy functional programming. Snap is my web framework of choice and working with a Haskell/Snap/Riak stack has been awesome for a project I'm currently working on.
Honestly I'd said don't look for "only Stripe-like interview processes" but look for the tells that can give away the information you care about and don't be shy about ending the process.
I've started ending interview processes when I see that the company has poor internal communication skills, expects unreasonable, or has to roundabout-reason in favor of, ideologies, etc. This has allowed me to weed out companies that aren't a match faster and find companies that I want to work with.
What does "Muscle Quality" mean and what do you mean by "Muscle Fitness"?
Does MQ give me any information about type 1/2a/2b fibers?
Is this product in any way useful for someone training for high level athletics?
Can you compare the bodyfat accuracy of the product with other methods (such as calipers)?
Will I be able to access the raw data instead of the MQ reading?
I'm not an expert by any means but I found this route to be a fun one and the riak/erlang related irc channels are awesome (and helpful) to hang around in.
[1] Riak: http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/downloads/ [2] http://www.read.seas.harvard.edu/~kohler/class/cs239-w08/dec... [3] https://github.com/basho/riak_core [4] http://www.rgoarchitects.com/Files/fallacies.pdf
Firebase is a backend whereas Angular would be used on the frontend.
Here[2] is an article in Runner's World which discusses some studies and provides more links to balance the story.
tldr; The headline of the article is sensationalized.
[1] http://articles.elitefts.com/training-articles/women-running...
[2] http://www.runnersworld.com/health/how-does-endurance-traini...
It's curiosity based. I'd be interested to know if there are statistics for this.
Citation?
[1] Fire hydrants, Scorpions, Iron Crosses, Skipping, etc.