bentcorner

I see a parallel here where a competitor's product is taking over and MS leaders see it becoming an existential problem and are putting their foot down and pushing internal users to the company's products.

Also if half the company don't even want to use something made by the other half it's a bad look lol

It's the same reason Teams got so much attention during lockdown.

This is your second paragraph but reads awkwardly. You mention two halves in the previous paragraph, so I kind of try to map those two halves to the halves in this paragrpah. But I don't understand what the second half is in this second paragraph.

> Three months ago the lodge's social channels went dark. Not for lack of content; the lodge has years of raw footage across multiple SSDs. The bottleneck was editing time, and my time disappeared. Claude Code with Opus 4.5 (and then 4.6) hit the point in February where you could leave agents running for hours and come back to merged PRs. KaribuKit was going live with its first paying property in the same window. I stopped sleeping properly, started running three or four agents in parallel in the background, and the months when I would have cut reels turned into months when I shipped software instead.

I don't fully understand this paragraph either. Your time disappeared? Into what? Was it the lack of sleep? I don't know what KaribuKit is.

> I asked it out loud: how does the agent know what's in each clip?

Did you? Really?

> Four bugs, four lessons

I've noticed that AI tends to rathole into random things when summarizing a piece of work, so I'm skeptical that these were actually the most four interesting bugs you could have shared.

I would recommend you just remove this section or take the time to actually think about some learnings you had from this project. Syntax errors or missed CLI params are mildly interesting but what makes these four bugs interesting to your readers?

> The actual take

The same criticism here applies. Are these your real takes, or did Claude make these up too?

Some obvious tells to me of things that AI likes to write that humans rarely ever say:

> Both real, both consuming attention.

> Four constraints set the shape:

There's way more than just this (the writing style of nearly the entire post screams Opus 4.7), but that's just what jumped out at me when I started reading your post.

I don't mind you used AI to write this but in the future when you write using AI, take the time to read the entirety of the article and consider the goals of what you want to write and if the AI achieved that. Take out what doesn't belong and make sure that what you have left says things in your voice.

I'm guessing though that there are other improvements in code quality and feature velocity. I've noticed personally that AI is really good at catching smaller things that are easy to miss (e.g., if you ask it to rename fooTheBars it also updates all the relevant comments or enums that you might have missed).

Robots have landed on Mars. Maybe they will even figure out how to use minerals on Mars to build more of themselves. It is plausible to me that as far as space exploration is concerned that it will be autonomous within a few hundred years.

Not sure how that came about.

You might not have merge conflicts but I imagine you could end up with conflicting guidance from two separate pieces of law (e.g., law A says you must wear green on St. Patrick's day, law B outlaws green pajamas).

In the customer service case, it has read access to the customer data who is calling, read access to support docs, write access to creating a ticket, and maybe write access to that customer's account within reason. Nothing else. It cannot search the internet, it cannot run a shell, nothing else whatsoever.

You treat it like you would an entry level person who just started - there is no reason to give the new hire the capability to SMS the entire customer base.

Alternatives are always good but IMO brew is just not something I interact with all that much and to me it's "good enough". It works and does what I expect, although to be fair maybe I'm on the happy path <shrug>.

Roblox is in some ways there, I think Epic thought fortnite could have competed. IMO they made a strategic mistake in shackling their game-as-a-platform to Fortnite. I thought the music fortnite thing looked interesting, but I have negative interest in installing Fortnite.

Call it something else and make it literally the first thing you see on epicgames.com, have it work on mobile, and maybe things would be different today.

(Aside: Roblox wins because I can go from typing in roblox.com into my browser and be playing a game with a friend in under 20s)

I've also found it to be better to ask the LLM to come up with several ideas and then spawn additional agents to evaluate each approach individually.

I think the general problem is that context cuts both ways, and the LLM has no idea what is "important". It's easier to make sure your context doesn't contain pink elephants than it is to tell it to forget about the pink elephants.

I'd be surprised if all those stars align anytime soon.

It makes sense if it's a one-off but there are better solutions.

Maybe it does make sense for small scale businesses that need just a little automation? Like a humanoid robot could restock shelves and do inventory in a grocery store at night, and you wouldn't need to retrofit anything to be able to do that.

Large scale factories seems like the wrong use case for humanoid robots.

I totally get that not everybody is like that, but I am, and so I stopped going to Facebook.

These days I'm in private Whatsapp groups for my direct family and so I learn about what they do, and not the random stuff that my neighbors and 20-years-past classmates did.

My wife is still active on Facebook and I actually do still visit occasionally to boost her posts but that's about it.

I actually considered using an LLM but in my experience they "warp" the content too much for anything like this. The effort required to get them to retain what I would consider something to my taste would take longer than just writing the poem myself. (Although tbf it's been awhile since I've asked a LLM to do parody work, so I could be wrong)

    I met a user from an antique land
    Who said: Two squares of a clip of video
    Stand in at the end of the search. Near them,
    Lossly compressed, a profile with a pfp, whose smile,
    And vacant eyes, and shock of content baiting,
    Tell that its creator well those passions read
    Which yet survive, stamped on these unclicked things,
    The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed:
    And on the title these words appear:
    "My name is Ozymandias, Top Youtuber of All Time:
    Look on my works, ye Mighty, and like and subscribe!"
    No other video beside remains. Round the decay
    Of that empty profile, boundless and bare
    The lone and level page stretch far away.

FWIW I encounter this in Android every so often (using gboard). Anecdotally I don't know what causes it (I swear sometimes it's worse and sometimes it's better), but Android isn't entirely problem free.

For a passive read-only device (like most satellite/cable receivers 20 years ago), it was probably more important to allow customers to easily replace their lost remotes than it was to prevent pranksters (who could often be dissuaded by more physical means).

My PC and the roku device were both wired to two different ports on a router (iirc an Edgerouter X running openwrt at the time). This didn't repro when the roku streamed other services (hulu/youtube tested), only netflix. This also didn't repro if the roku was connected over wireless (connecting to an AP wired to a different port). Just opening netflix also didn't repro, the roku had to be actively streaming a netflix video.

I never ended up solving it, I just worked around it by making the roku connect over wireless.

It did take me forever to figure out the problem though. For a long time I'd be in one room getting frustrated with my computer while someone was innocently watching netflix in the other room.