Science does change based on ideological beliefs.
See, e.g., https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
2,578 karma · joined June 26, 2014
See, e.g., https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
Copying a famous actor’s voice without any kind of agreement at all is something else.
It’s almost always more usable to run a desktop session in Xvnc on the server and connect to it with a VNC client, because if you get disconnected, you can just reconnect.
…then the patent can be invalidated on the basis that it is obvious.
If the invention is commercially valuable, then invalidating it (or just pretending it doesn’t exist until you get sued, then invalidating it) can make more sense than licensing it.
A related issue is that there are many, many patents that most people (e.g., competitors) mostly ignore, because everyone, including the patent owner, knows that they would be invalidated if challenged.
As far as I know, this is usually not true. Neither the buyer nor seller must disclose the existence of a loan on the property. For example, many loans are between family members who would prefer to keep them private, and the law allows that. Practically, however, any commercial lender (even a seller who offers financing) will record a mortgage with the county recorder so that he has priority in a foreclosure.
The sale price, however, usually is disclosed at least to the county assessor for property tax purposes. The exceptions would be where an heir inherits a property and the value is not reassessed.
Edit: You got nine of us with one comment. You win.
In some cases, a person could even face criminal liability (e.g., hacking game servers using a modified client could be both a EULA violation and a crime).
If you read past the clickbait title, however, you’ll find that the individual prefectures have had stricter age of consent laws for many years. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Asia
Did you know that the United States still has NO age of consent law at all? It’s true, there is no federal law that addresses the subject. (Each state has its own law.) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_the_Unite...
Unlike a traditional publisher, however, to whom an author sells the exclusive right to publish a work, you have the right to take your tweets and publish them elsewhere. There are many examples of authors who have adapted their Twitter posts into blog articles or books, and published them on other platforms, or even in print.
As for the contextual value of your tweets, if the tweets form one half of a conversation with a real person whose tweets you cannot use elsewhere, then they can be recast in the form of a dialogue with a fictional person, something which has been done since the days of Socrates.
Exactly, you can repost them elsewhere. That is the opposite of “you can’t take them anywhere else.”
Of course you can. Twitter/X doesn’t own your tweets. You can take them and post them somewhere else if you want.
This is all clearly stated in the Twitter/X terms of service. https://twitter.com/en/tos
“To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;”
U.S. Const. Art. I, Sec. 8.
If a mortgage is a security in this context. But I don’t know for sure. Usually the answer is the Commerce Clause.
By the way, anyone who has applied for a mortgage in the U.S. has seen many, many warnings about how lying on a mortgage application is a federal crime that carries very serious penalties.
That was 20+ years ago, before flat panel screens in every headrest that could tune into one of a couple dozen looping channels, and long, long before you could watch anything at any time from a huge library.
If you are one of the attorneys in that case, then you are found guilty of fraud and extortion, are sent to jail, are disbarred from the practice of law, and are forced to repay all of your proceeds from your scheme.