948 karma · joined June 6, 2012
While the field may not need full blown regulation like the regular pharmaceutical industry, I'm guessing it needs something more than what exists now.
I've been finding a lot of things seem to cost more at Amazon lately - although I'm not generally looking at things that are very expensive - like <$50, so I'm probably seeing that "free shipping with prime" being added back in.
This is a great case in point if true.
And even longer if you're willing to pay outrageous sums of money.
I say this as someone who hasn't used Basecamp, so I don't really have an opinion there.
>What would be the motivation for him to allow it to continue happening?
Because the company got where it is with exactly this culture. Look at AIG in the 2000's -- huge portions of the company lying about their finances, leading to the ouster of their CEO. Only to be followed up by a huge bailout in the 2008 financial crisis under the new CEO. The culture was poisoned, it comes from the top down - everyone in management is cutthroat because that's the only way to survive. And it's pretty much impossible to change.
I worked at a company that was purchased by AIG - American General. My executive level boss was dishonest - lied about people working for her, and lied to other executives. She made her way from a low level executive to a Executive VP once the company was bought by AIG. Once you've got a toxic culture, that's how the company works; and I think there are a lot of companies like this.
As far as the bank goes: this is what they get when they outsource their work to an unscrupulous company. The company you're working for likely cheats both ways - don't expect to be treated any better in the future. They probably screw a lot of their employees over. They seem to have no issue doing illegal things. You don't want to be working for a company like this.
It's stupid behavior as far as the company is concerned, but from whoever you made look bad, well, they stopped that from happening again, didn't they?
Now I realize that there are real specialties that you can't train someone for that easily, and if that's the case, then those people should be making a lot of money no matter where they are located.
It's not that simple. Imagine if you have a relationships with the daughter of someone in the drug trade (or one of your children do) - and have a bad breakup. Imagine if someone in a cartel decides to take a liking to your daughter - it happens all the time in certain areas. It can happen in America or anywhere - you or someone in your family can get in an abusive relationship - but in Mexico, cartel members are used to getting what they want and acting very violently when they don't.
Aren't we (U.S.) the richest country in the world?
Lately bigger players have started to take notice:
https://spring.io/blog/2017/01/04/introducing-kotlin-support...
https://blog.gradle.org/kotlin-meets-gradle
I'm still not sure where it will end up, but things look pretty good right now.
But wrt Type Erasure, Kotlin doesn't completely get rid of it; but it does offer some ability to retain Types in some generic situations.
But once you get to more or less full automation, the only people who would make money under the current system would be the owners - there wouldn't need to be any workers.