It's surprising just how many conferences are put on. I learned about some more from the Lisp in Summer Projects page[1].
TL;DR: dig into the community(ies) of conferences you're interested in. You'll still miss some.
343 karma · joined April 25, 2008
It's surprising just how many conferences are put on. I learned about some more from the Lisp in Summer Projects page[1].
TL;DR: dig into the community(ies) of conferences you're interested in. You'll still miss some.
What if there are 0 universes? Does 0 exist without any universes?
At the same time, splitting your application into a client/server architecture is not a hack but an engineering decision. There are times when this decision is natural e.g. Music Player Daemon (MPD)[1]. For most CLI applications, there's no clear benefit (but the general approach has no clear downside either - the code overhead of this approach can be brought very low).
Certainly, in a production application you would want to secure the messaging channel (Nailgun doesn't).
[1] A music playing server: http://www.musicpd.org/. Some of the clients happen to be command line: http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Clients#Command_Line_Clients
If that's not your problem with the JVM, what is?
It would be nice if, when a computation is running in the instarepl, the computation indicator would display inline e.g. with the previous result - perhaps graying the result out?
How would I go about implementing this myself? Or is LightTable reflection not yet publicly available?
Particularly, I'm interested in the node & connection model. Any chance we'll see custom nodes (followed by sharable nodes, modules)? At the very least, custom equation nodes would make entering math easier and then you wouldn't need to provide a node for all math functions. Notably, `exp` is missing (would be nice to have damping in animations - and then expose the time variable).
At any rate, this makes for a very interesting platform!
What are your thoughts on implementing reversible patterns?
That said, I'd guess the weak link that puts the 200mA limit in place is not actually in the I/O circuitry but is how much current can safely be drawn by the I/O pins when the chip is otherwise fully utilized - peripherals and CPU both consuming max power.
I built a layer of clojure code on top of the JNI bindings to get
an entirely functional interface to vba-rerecording. This
interface treats state of the emulator as an immutable object, and
allows me to do everything I could do with the lower level C
interface in a functional manner. Using this functional code, I
wrote search programs that take a particular game-state and try
out different combinations of button presses to get any desired
effect. By combining different styles of search with different
initial conditionsThe Cortex project they having going is stellar and there are some great examples of Clojure-java interop.
> ChenLi Wang, who runs the growth team at Facebook [sic: Dropbox?], said that the leading indicator of an engaged Dropbox user is when they put at least one file in one Dropbox folder on one device.
Basically - the leading indicator is any use at all. The other business' all had, relatively, a much higher threshold.
This is probably because Dropbox is immediately useful and stupid-easy to use.
Of course, it's hard to take this at face value since we don't know how everyone is defining an engaged user (and each definition isn't directly comparable to the other services' definitions).
> If Redis isn’t available, for whatever reason, we could rebuild the gaps from the canonical data in Mongo. We’ve never had to do this.
I'm not sure this is so straight-forward.
So, this is a guest post by Sqoot hosted by togo.io, who owns the redistogo.com. Can anyone explain redistogo.com's pricing? I understand the value in not running your own service dependencies, but the redistogo.com prices seem really high to me. I was under the impression redis is fairly easy to manage. What kinds of operational tasks does redistogo.com perform for a redis instance that would warrant such high prices?
Here the git client includes logic to speak (translate to) ftp - which is great for this purpose.
What if you could say: `git push fleet master`
where fleet is a remote that translates git-speak into a deployment.
I realize - this is simply an imitation of Heroku. But, it may be interesting to flex git in this way: a code change protocol.
This and the recently discussed codeq could yield some very interesting possibilities.
Precisely.
MIT's behavior is the projection of its attitude. Through inertia, MIT aligns its participants' attitudes to various approximations of the overall attitude.
Or, the overall attitude is the reduction of the participants' attitudes.
MIT makes available to all free printing and shuttles.
What can organizations generally do to help foster the sharing of information?
MIT encourages collaboration and their professors are accessible.
Of course, simply applying these tricks to an organization is doomed to fail. To do so would simply be to create a cargo cult.
What matters is the attitude with which you approach your organization. Your attitude is what drives the organizational experience.