1,019 karma · joined December 19, 2017
contact: hn@tuxli.ch
[0] https://github.com/mikeperry-tor/vanguards/blob/master/READM...
[1] https://status.torproject.org/issues/2022-06-09-network-ddos...
EDIT: This is a CNAME chain and although it's not recommended it's valid https://serverfault.com/a/309660
Yes we may have to constrain this a little more sometimes but we have plenty of IP space and therefore time before we have to consider this.
EDIT: The "sexually explicit photos" are a video she did for a porn website. I'm not sure how this qualifies as "leaked" or "revenge porn".
Is it? The problem I have is that this deplatforming campaign uses dubious media reports and Wikipedia to create this "It's the worst site ever and you absolutely have to drop it" narrative. e.g. The "The Kiwi Farms community considers it a goal to drive its targets to suicide" is sourced from the Book "Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment" which itself links to some random forum with a post saying that. Somehow this is enough to post everywhere that it's a forum with the sole goal to drive people to suicide.
Yes thats exactly what free speech is about. It's the public that decides what it thinks about it and not some secret council.
So you basically replaced the "we regularly have to update the OS" with "we regularly have to pull the newest image". It's possible because I have a Linux admin background but I don't see that big of a difference here. Oh and just using whatever curated image is there doesn't necessarily provide you with a secure environment. [0]
[0] https://snyk.io/blog/top-ten-most-popular-docker-images-each...
Most consumer routers have a stateful firewall [0] for IPv6 that basically behaves like NAT. But it's less of a problem than on IPv4 anyway. It's possible to scan the whole IPv4 Internet in less than 5 minutes. [1] And this is done constantly by many people. The IPv6 address space is way to big to do this and you have to harvest addresses. [2] It's always a good idea to have a firewall but unlike IPv4 you don't get port and vulnerability scans seconds after you expose a host to the internet.
>which kinda makes v6 pointless doesn’t it?
IPv6 is mostly useful for ISPs. There are just not enough IPv4 addresses for everyone.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateful_firewall [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZMap_(software) [2] https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Targeted+IPv6+Scans+Using+pool.nt...
- The thread about her didn't have a post for 6 months before she killed herself
- Facebook locked her profile when she posted about suicide. Why is Kiwi Farms to blame for this?
- She was thrown out where she was living a few days prior because the people she was living with decided they could no longer take care of her
- She had severe mental health issues unrelated to her being harassed
- She threatened to kill herself after that and was taken into custody, spent 2 days in triage at a mental health facility but was never properly hospitalized and left
- She cited homelessness and mental health problems as reason for the suicide
https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2018/06/woman_who_set_se...
I guess you haven't read the article because the whole article is about why it's not that easy as you portray it. I don't want to to recite everything but for instance "NTT refuses to peer with any company that peers with my subnet" He can't use anything that peers with NTT (a Tier 1 transit provider).
Sure Cloudflare could drop them but the reason people want Kiwi Farms to loose Cloudflare is because they are DDoSing them. What is a DDoS protection worth if all it takes to circumvent it are a few people screeching on social media?
>buy their own servers and host it themselves
They are doing it already [0]
[0]: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-10-28/where-sidewalk-end...
This sounds exactly like what the Twitter "good guys" do all the time to cancel people.
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2022/aug/24/chattanoogas...
That's not exactly a price point that I call "residential internet" you can get 25G or even 100G or 400G literally everywhere as long as you have deep pockets. I'm not sure what's the news here.
[0]: https://variety.com/2018/gaming/news/chloe-sagal-death-12028...
[1]: https://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=308671
[2]: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/07/kiwi-farms-the-webs-...
[0]: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-10-28/where-sidewalk-end...
Both don't require a lot of bandwidth and you have caches for their content.
You can buy additional data if you've used your included data. That's basically the same.
No it wouldn't. The actual usage has a negligible impact on the expenses for infrastructure. Most people barely use any bandwidth anyway. Even on 1 Gbit/s lines the average bandwidth used is in the single digit Mbit/s. And the usage basically doesn't differ if they have a 100Mbit/s or 10Gbit/s connection. Also those countries where data caps are still a thing are generally those with the worst Internet.