1,210 karma · joined August 26, 2010
Closed it as there is no hints on what the product actually is.
Is this about doing a structured risk assessment for e.g. Security risks, safety risks etc? Like a design FMEA, security FMEA try to bring up?
> Only the current audio/video frame is being sent to the viewers, there is no way they can download/cache the videos either for future usage.
In the end, if the video ends up at the viewer there is a way to capture it.
Codescene was built on top of an opensource tool by the way. But the UI is nice to have.
WordPress gives me the perfect mix of control and easy extensions on demand, without effort.
It is in every engineer to write the gold plated car, as it is in marketing and sales to always need the future tomorrow to gain competitive edge.
The number of times I wrote beautiful code are quite numerous, the number of times it is still not used to its potential as well. In the end I spent too much time over engineering for a disastrous moment or extension that never happened, or was never requested by a customer.
I have written godforsaken shortcuts that are used so frequently it made me feel proud and ashamed at the same time.
Now, I have come to believe that knowing when to stop is the greatest skill of all.
"Let's deploy to production" https://youtu.be/5p8wTOr8AbU
When I land on Bitsensor I see a bunch of text so I have to start actually parsing and understanding that text. Everything is very bright and images don't say a lot. When I browse to their product page I see a lot of white space and only a tiny actual product image that is hard to see. The remainder are not product images which make it harder for me to parse how this content is offered to me, which is a big deal when choosing a product.
Seems to be a minor issue on your website when accessed from a mobile device. On my iOS + chrome the pricing page, detailed features tabs all show only the stats for the first (free) tier.
I'll pass for now (but I think I like the idea).
Most of the article goes on about stolen MD identities used to pose as a doctor, making false claims. Your stolen data is only worth pocket money it seems. Not to say the danger is real and your data should be protected and in your control at all times.
The interesting part is I suspect older systems pose a greater threat than new systems centrally storing information in cloud-on-premise or cloud environments. The lengths we go these days to separate actual observations or data from the PII bits in fear of a hack make it so the hacker has to hack at least two, but more likely three or more separate systems these days. Two of which typically should not be exposed outside the VPC/DMZ. I sure hope this article, or similar ones, will not be used by parlements and countries to slow down innovations even further. There is already enough trouble slowing down innovation in Healthcare as it is today.
Let's not fear this but see it as motivation to do our utmost best to protect your data forcing innovation to get rid of all the legacy systems that still live in the world. And while we are at it, use your anonimized data (with consent) to improve the quality of care, lower cost of care and improve patient experience and outcomes.
Most people do not enjoy that more then once or twice.
HN is super nice because it is so condensed (for me).
50% to charity sounds like a lot to me. Makes me see a risk your service goes down at some point in time. If anything I'd rather see a lower number and know more money goes into the product. That might just mean your service is not for me, there might be plenty who see it as a unique selling point. I see it as a risk.
Other then that, well, it is still the same thing as last time right?
Spoiler: (s)he learned React.
You post the same request to the /health endpoint. Normally this returns 200 but in case of an internal server error it can return 500. However, reporting this in Gherkin as:
Feature: Test service v1.0.0
Scenario: /health returns: undefined
Given I have "unauthorized" request
When I submit to "/health" using "get"
Then I should receive "200" status code
Scenario: /health returns: undefined
Given I have "unauthorized" request
When I submit to "/health" using "get"
Then I should receive "500" status code
Sounds like a terribly hard space to succeed in when we life in an era where you get personal recommendations on sites like HN in minutes and Google already seqrches the entire space on every possible review that is public.
In addition the internet is pushing back on books via companies sharing their experiences via sites backed by OpenSource projects.
Books still have value though, and finding good ones is a nice feature. Your tagging and suggestions really need to be top notch for users to really want to pay for that but if you get it, who knows.
Best of luck!
Would advice the authors to have a demo/sample as there are many that claim similar functionality but as a user you want to get a feel this one actually works.
Unless this is one of those “landing page only” startup ideas to see if the idea would work and enough are interested to make the product. In that case I wish them good luck.
There is so much you wouldn't do for yourself but do for the ones you love. That doesn't make it insane or just to not disappoint. You do it because it makes you happy to see them happy. If you would do the same if you were alone is not the thing that matters here.
- Enterprise Architect is a great tool but produces diagrams that look dated. This means I sometimes copy in another tool for certain types of meetings that require fancy powerpoints (pitch like presentations, customers, ex. Management etc.
- if the source isn't there I create from scratch. I have to link post-source creation to update and link my diagrams to source code. I do not generate source code from enterprise architect because we do not work model based and usually my diagrams that I create in advance are not detailed enough to generate the source. (Nor should they be)
- Sometimes the right diagram type is just not there in EA. I created my own templates for our department with all AWS logos and services, Azure, docker, and many others. That's a pain..
* I work in a global enterprise. Size of source about 6 million LOC. EA does handle that without hickups.
1) Having CT scans, and paying for them, does not really objectively lead to the conclusion that followed. Let's feel that tumor inside your lungs.
2) CT scans can also work without contrast agents. In addition they typically do not register everybody for a CT scan nor pump them full with contrast agents. There is a process. In US some hospitals are trigger happy as they get paid per case, blame the system not the technology. If anything an algorithm will fix that nasty human behaviour.
3) Having biased humans enforce decisions is not always a guarantee for success either. Every human sees only a fraction of the total amount of cases an algorithm processes within seconds. There are several fields where AI already outperforms elaborate test panels of MDs. Though it is hard to introduce these algorithms for the same reasons Tesla is having issues. Who is responsible when a mistake is made?
3.1) you would be amazed how often MDs do not agree when the same problem is put in front of them. 50/50 and 60/40 are very common cases. AI is typically more in the 80/20 90/10 range which is a huge improvement.
Now, all of this does not mean we do not need MDs anymore. An important aspect often neglected due to time bounds is the interaction of a patient with the doctor. With algorithms saving time more could go to the patient. That's a win.