https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.ai https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vince_Cate
A colorful character to say the least, and exactly the kind of person I'd expect to be running the ccTLD of a small caribbean island.
1,920 karma · joined January 16, 2013
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.ai https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vince_Cate
A colorful character to say the least, and exactly the kind of person I'd expect to be running the ccTLD of a small caribbean island.
It's technically the domain for Anguilla, a literal British colony in the Caribbean.
It appears to be managed by some random guy- check out the .ai registration FAQ: http://whois.ai/faq.html
If you are going to use .ai, just be aware the top level of the domain appears to be managed by some dude with a gmail account. Its not necessarily bad, but something to consider if you're planning to host your billion dollar AI startup on it.
If engineers are getting into AI development through OpenAI, they're using tools and systems within the OpenAI ecosystem.
Daily on HN there's a post on some AI implementation faster than chatgpt. But my starting point is OpenAI. If you can capture the devs, especially at this stage, you get a force multiplier.
There are few other platforms I can think of where someone with deep expertise on any subject can publish interesting, informed takes on their field- On a platform where the barrier to entry to publish is near-zero, provided with a random chance to go viral.
When I used Twitter, seeking out and following these kinds of experts actually made the experience of Twitter a rich and informative platform- albeit one where you constantly needed to "weed the garden".
The problem of course is that was a thin layer of wheat in a big bucket of chaff- but there is a better answer to "best alternative to twitter is no twitter": The best alternative to Twitter is one that can maximize virality for expert opinions; incentivizing other users to write engaging, structured opinions. Try to build a system where the best way to engagement farm is to show real thought leadership.
I would assume this actually gels very nicely with neural nets since its constantly optimizing for fitness. Hell in theory you could bake in your SLA/SLIs into the models to self correct? Give the model direct feedback that its unfit?
A CEO's sole responsibility is to deliver value to the shareholders. It literally doesn't matter how that value is delivered, as long as it gets delivered.
I've found it especially useful for fixing complex workflows or working with custom actions. It's not strictly needed, but it does speed up your workflow once you figure out the kinks.
I also learned there's a long history of AI skepticism, the root of which comes down to "Compositionality(?)"- and this wall of understanding meaning has vexed AI for decades.
That would be lost in proposed short form summary.
IMO I think something like Jetbrains should be leaning into integration, not all-in-one. Connective tissue last longer than walled garden.
I'd love to see this technology aimed at concept art for games. I don't think this would hurt employed concept artists, I do think it will be a tool concept artists can use to quickly thumbnail significantly more versions of a vision.
That artist will then refine the results into something supremely engaging to humans.
Really I see this as an incredible tool for artists to help refine truly innovative ideas.
The thing about a decent monetization model is that is _has_ to be thought about and structured from the very beginning.
If you are going to have a live team creating content for a game over the long term, then the game has to make money over the long term as well. If you try to hamfist that monetization model at the end, it looks like a hamfisted monetization scheme that players are _very_ attuned to.
Bad monetization design is like bad game design, it makes the game worse. Good monetization design can allow you to support your game for _decades_.
League of Legends would have died years ago if not for a monetization model that worked over the long term.
Oil markets are pretty tight to begin with- they're finely tuned to react to even marginal shifts in supply/demand. Have massive changes like the lockdowns or turn off a major supplier, you see equally massive swings in price, backwardation/contango levels, etc.
The overwhelming culture of Bitcoin now is Number Go Up, which will be tested should US regulators fall more anti-crypto than pro-crypto.
I didn't look close enough to see if what they're patenting is something specifically unique to Unity3d's implementation. It would have to be?
From the abstract it sounds like the equivalent of trying to patent Observer/Observable.
Maybe there is a history of patenting software architecture that I'm not aware of, I'm not an expert in patenting in software development.
Being in urban environment means higher dependence on fragile supply chains- food security is totally dependent on JIT grocery store inventories.
Rural homes, by virtue of being isolated, are easier to self isolate.
While that would make an interesting episode of CSI: Who Cares, it doesn't square with the flash rebellions we've seen since the Arab Spring.
The nature of rebellions in our time are sudden, decentralized, massive protest movements with no clear leaders and no clear goals.
Much harder to counter one of these protest waves than troll the darknet for anarcho-hipster corporate raiders.
That being said, I still feel violated every time `ls` returns `bad command or filename`
Most projects fizz out when the excitement wears off before the amount of work you've already done on it has enough momentum to push you to do one more task.
When I push though that motivational hurdle, I find the amount of work already done incentives to continue on with it. The next task is obvious and relatively easy, because there is something to work with.
Now, losing confidence that everything you've written is garbage and refactoring the same systems over and over again until you give up- that's the hurdle I choke on :D