3,001 karma · joined January 23, 2013
Would you like me to diagram the precise mechanisms through which these features transform users into passive recipients of AI-initiated interactions and transactions?
I am tired or Apple fanboys being deathly afraid of criticizing Apple: high frustration.
You don't need to pick a side and then see everything black and white. I use apple products but I am not afraid of calling out Apple on bad decisions.
iOS doesn't magically need less RAM. It just aggressively kills background apps to stay within memory limits, then makes you wait while it reloads them from scratch (burning battery with CPU cycles and NVMe reads instead).
> RAM uses electricity and costs money so it makes perfect sense to pack less of it
No, it's bullshit. Apple kept RAM low to save money, not battery. They could easily pack 16gb with negligible effect on battery life.
Which is weird, since they focus so much on on-device AI. I guess the very very slightly lower profit margin from including more RAM is incredible unpalatable.
In IT, I am inclined to agree with that. In real engineering, it's sometimes necessary, especially dangerous technology and technology that people trust with their life
Please don't call this an init systern. It's a barebones process supervisor.
LLMs don't see letters, they see tokens. This is a foundational attribute of LLMs. When you point out that the LLM does not know the number of R's in the word "Strawberry", you are not exposing the LLM as some kind of sham, you're just admitting to being a fool.
Perhaps their open source model release doesn't look so good compared to this one
Open weights