awestroke

Great, let them do whatever they want

Feel free to use those things

Well, if you search for these projects yourself and read the first few paragraphs on their websites, you might learn the selling points. Warp has a lot of features that are just not possible in urxvt.

Well just limit the scroll buffer then

Just use a non-graphical ssh session if you just want a shell on the remote machine

That's a very very american way of thinking

> Now you know that the Caddyfile is just converted to JSON for you.

> The Caddyfile seems easier than JSON, but should you always use it? There are pros and cons to each approach. The answer depends on your requirements and use case.

Followed by a table comparing the json and caddyfile approaches. What's the confusion?

Yes, your comment seems to be devoid of any point

Source?

This is very uncommon to do and cannot be compared to exceptions

Oh, so somebody liking language features that you find unnecessary is "obsession with language features"?

> Languages like Go and Elm spurn extravagance. They resist overcomplication. They force me to solve real problems instead of fighting compiler errors and stylistic differences.

I hate this mindset. "<my favorite language> is used to solve REAL problems, other languages are not as good for creating VALUE. Any powerful language features, ergonomic syntactical sugar or tooling that does not exist in <my favorite language> is useless". So strange

The appeal of swift is that it is lightyears better than ObjectiveC. To ObjC developers that are used to being treated like trash by Apple (abysmal documentation, stone age IDE and tooling etc) that's huge

That depends on which model you use it with. It's "bring your own model"

I've used nginx for a long time, but for the last few years I've been using Caddy for my projects. So easy to set up, easier configs and automatic tls certificates via letsencrypt

Still a good thing that they can stop massively asymmetric attacks (huge number of cheap drones with cheap explosives)

Americans use the weirdest units...

The idea in and of itself is not what is being rediscovered. Nobody is reinventing the wheel. It's whether the implementation is ergonomic and powerful that determines whether it catches on.

Did they sell this circuit board strapped to plywood as a product? Exactly, they didn't.

They have probably iterated a lot, what makes you think they haven't? You have zero visibility into their process

AirPods have very very small screens, you could even say nonexistent. Their compute capacity is not very large either

Sounds super boring. I'm glad you're not in charge of Apple

Also much better in every way

MIT-licensed: https://github.com/loro-dev/crdt-richtext

Nobody is asking that

An in-memory circular buffer will wear out NAND flash? Which phones use NAND flash as memory?

It'll probably be an in-memory circular buffer of the last n minutes, and then you get to save it if anything happens

It'll probably be an in-memory circular buffer of the last n minutes, and then you get to save it if anything happens

I don't know why, but I find this hilarious. Imagine if this style of llm prompting becomes commonplace

Old? Chatgpt has only existed for half a year, v4 for a month

People must be allowed to judge and write off artists solely based on the last thing they made