asp_hornet

The origin teams are comprised of the all the best players in the league across clubs so they’re like dream teams.

> a nuclear attack as a consequence of breaking the pact

That escalated quickly

> and while truthfully I may never do an ultra that requires that much battery life

Hell yeah! Don’t let dreams be dream

I go running for hours in remote locations by myself and carry a phone, watch and a satellite communicator amongst other things. It all depends.

Thats unfair. There is no way to say either way from the article.

Thank you for this update.

> the team of engineers would have produced idiomatic rust

Not necessarily. Didn’t Microsoft port the TS compiler to Go and they did it by translating the TS? It wasn’t idiomatic Go.

I picked up Elixir this year. I’m gobsmacked on what the language and BEAM offer. Such a slept on ecosystem. I’m full convert.

New site looks great.

Not sure of your exact constraints but is something like this useful?

https://hyperview.org/

I landed on this too.

An advantage of this is when you got to hotfix an old customer, the skills align with how the code was authored at that point in time.

Yes, arguably a worse one because you can’t stop to think.

Doesn’t stop it from being really cool though.

Is this the “taste” I keep hearing people say they bring?

Don’t be fooled, the first few years you get spoiled with “the first moments” of things. Then suddenly the “last moments” start creeping in, “the last nappy”, “the last car seat”, at first they seem like a god send but then they accumulate like an avalanche.

One day you will pick them up and, and most likely neither of you will know it, but it will be the last time you ever do.

Treasure everything, even the insanity.

Disclosure of a vulnerability doesnt mean a bad guy found it.

“Company pleads that we’re analogue creatures and should pay them $1 a photo to save our souls.”

I want to like the message but it just leaves a bad taste.

I think language, frameworks, domain and style can all influence the quality of the output. I think it’s hard to compare experiences.

I think OP’s point is that it was bought not made similar to Instagram.

> This is a fuzzy signal, so you shouldn’t fire your intern when they say “it’s not this — it’s that”.

The author literally points to that tell in the article.

In a weird twist, I wonder if you’re an LLM?

Yeah, it sucks man.

There was a good moment where I thought it wouldn’t come for my org but here I am.

Not saying the tech doesn’t have merit but if you’re not blasting the slop cannon constantly and praising Dario for the pleasure, you’re on the list.

No OP but I can tell you exactly where I find my peace:

4 dependents, a cost of living that keeps rocketing and an industry that’s decided “the people who don’t glaze this shit don’t get to continue”.

Maybe Ive sold out but what’s the alternative, I’m 17 years in, I can’t figure how I pivot my expertise and still support the family’s demands.

> will programmers write

Who’s going to tell them?

> the more people you have using your models, the more training and fine-tuning data you're accumulating, so the faster you can develop the next frontier model

I’ve wondered this but then wouldn’t a large amount of input now just be AI output from a previous PR/client email/spec document/chat. Training of that would be an issue leading to distillation?

As an Australian, I’m not particularly surprised by this. From purely a capacity perspective, it seemed fair to reason, if AI is so powerful and capacity is an issue, why wouldn’t you prioritise domestic and restrict foreign usage.

It’s a massive betrayal for foreign entities and it would be silly to continue with all my eggs in anthropic basket but I get it.

Agreed. But I think it’s also important to realise if you sent this article back to 2020 people would say it was pure fantasy that a tool could do this. Hype aside, there’s a bit of cool magic here.

The author just wrote an anecdote about how a prompt to fix an issue played out. Their conclusion wasn’t about cost or gushing at its ability but that it’s dangerous:

> Fable is arguably smarter and hence more suspicious of potentially malicious instructions. But that smartness is very much a two-edged sword: if it does get subverted by instructions, the amount of damage it can do given its relentless proactivity is terrifying.

This might sound like a joke but it’s a surprisingly good take. RSCSS provides a great set of principles to structure and isolate against unintended change. Open Props can be added for design tokens and Open UI has some great examples of components.

From my 10 years in the .net, it seemed C# devs will pretty much do anything to avoid using the right tool for the job or solving the immediate problem at hand.

Thank you for the answer, I was curious if they could produce it all too from the weights.

It’s all a bit voodoo to me but wouldn't the entire original source code be in the training data also?

As the author notes in the end, it would be really interesting to do these again on more recent models. I wonder if the no context file being cheaper still stands. But then how much does the harness influence the results. It can be frustrating trying to gauge what’s influencing what and if something suddenly starts working against you.