18,360 karma · joined April 10, 2020
I think the interesting question is this: why is this happening? There’s always been a battle between Google and SEO black hats, but I can’t remember the last time it got this bad. Is Google just temporarily losing, or have they lost the will to fix this at all?
In fact, right now the main DF developers are working with a partner studio to put a better UX on DF to sell on Steam. I bet an industry standard version control would be extremely helpful right about now.
I’m sorry, that’s absurd. You will always be picking pedantic fights with people if you expect everyone everywhere to meet the standards of peer reviewed medicine.
From the outside picking a fight over the difference between “93%” and “about 93%” on a technology board is pedantic to the point of being suspicious.
0 - Funny how the anti-“activist judges” crowd is silent about the Supreme Court making this doctrine up out of whole cloth.
1 - Down to the terrain in which the abuse happened.
If I understand correctly, you can mathematically model how effective countermeasures have to be in order to suppress a virus with a given R0. Given that the measles vaccine is 93% effective and sufficient to suppress one of the most infectious diseases we’ve ever seen (R0 of 12-18), I think 99.9% would be in the overkill category.
Also, there are other videos of this guy flying without that rig, which doesn't help his case.
Some of the anti-bitcoin crowd tried to make the term "Nakomoto Scheme" a thing, and clearly failed. The basic idea is that things like Axie Infinity have some of the aspects of a ponzi scheme, without the central organization and coordination that makes an actual ponzi scheme illegal. While there isn't a central operator paying out old investors with new investors money, anyone currently invested can only cash out if new people join. This begins to look a bit like a decentralized ponzi, with everyone currently invested in it motivated to evangelize it and convert new people in order to ensure the fresh supply of new buyers to keep the price up and/or let them cash out.
It also sounds like it would be a pretty radical change to how copyright laws work, but I’m no expert here.
This is trivially falsifiable. Weed is still a federal felony, despite 60% support for recreational & medical use, and another 31% support for medical alone[0]. In fact opposition for legalization is now a trivial 8% of the population, which is basically nobody. There isn't even a party with majority support for keeping weed illegal anymore.
If democratically elected states were guaranteed to eventually share the same definition as the majority, weed would have been legalized years ago for medical use. And yet, here we are.
0 - https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/04/16/americans-o...