2,413 karma · joined June 4, 2010
https://ary.pub
Considering Raskin's ideas about user interaction as "out there" is a matter of perspective. Touch screen interfaces that are now common today were once considered "out there". His love affair with the Canon Cat wasn't just a personal obsession. He made (what I considered to be) a group of well reasoned arguments about why it was so good based on the concepts it brought into reality. Off the top of my head I can recall automatic file saving (with no consideration to the file system) being one such argument. This feature will be shipping in the next release of OS X (Lion). If Raskin's ideas in the Humane Interface were "out there", then I take that phrase to be synonymous with "avant garde".
The zoom UI he talks about in another chapter (and what the OS X app Raskin has attempted to implement) seems like a strong candidate for a general data exploration and discovery UI. What he put forth in the book was conceptual, and no one has yet made a commercially or critically appealing implementation. That doesn't mean it won't happen. It just mean it hasn't happened.
How does one accidentally set the failure mode of any piece of authentication code to escalate privileges instead of denying them? Even when I was first learning to code web apps I never found myself accidentally accepting any password.
It's shocking (to me, at least) because it seems like such a beginner mistake.
Something about how you interact with it all just doesn't feel right. I might be able to say more after I used it for a bit, but I just don't want to. The UI doesn't invite the user into interaction so much as it does gawking.
I wish there was an alternative that matched Skype's previous good qualities (or better). The obfuscation of the OS X Skype client UI, plus the fact that they're now owned by Microsoft has cast a shadow on what used to be a great service (to me at least). Surely there is room in the market for a serious competitor.
Stranger (and more asinine) things have happened.
1. What was the motivation for creating this function? Was it (hopefully) to show off how "smart" he was? Was the company he worked for doing any kind of calculations related to (dear god no) financial or medical data that he thought he could improve?
2. How does anyone in this world escape grade school without knowing that one cannot divide by zero?
3. Someone thought dividing by zero should be a recoverable error?
Aside from the whole function being asinine the only way to know "why" would be to ask him. The answer would probably also qualify as asinine.
http://live.thisismynext.com/Event/Live_from_WWDC_2011
http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2011/06/liveblog-wwdc-2011...
Until the people in decision making positions take notice nothing is going to change.
At the jobs (consulting and otherwise) I've held in the last few years 75% of the companies stored passwords in plaintext. I'm not justifying it in any way shape or form, but Sony shouldn't be singled out. Until there is an immediate and clear financial incentive to use proper security companies are going to continue to ignore it.