I truly can’t wrap my head around this argument: been on the back of my head since I heard I think Peter Thiel say it (iirc.)
342 karma · joined March 6, 2012
I truly can’t wrap my head around this argument: been on the back of my head since I heard I think Peter Thiel say it (iirc.)
So in a way, I allowed myself to be a mechanical executer through the rules of algebra/calculus I've used, and then I re-engaged my intuition to understand what is happening.
It might even be my unwillingness to accept the mechanical approach purely that poses a big hindrance to fast tracking a lot of learning in this domain I have to do. Maybe I should just shut up and calculate as they say, but it's hard.
This just makes it all the more true that learning "languages" is the best way to become smarter. "Smarter" is a weird personal word here, but I'm at a loss for a better way to put it. What am going for is: languages can be an abstract lever that allows our limited cognitive potential to build culturally, which is distinct and will definitely interact with the knowledge ladder, but in a distinct way. "Languages" here are more general than just the textual/oral/syntactic, and am not talking about Russian/Arabic/French either.
Someone in the tree of replies for your parent explained and was contemplating actually going through with it.
Programming those would require a new paradigm possibly.
Are those within the ballpark of what you need to do?
--
Am adding this response as both:
-1 Hey maybe you didn't know about this
-2 A question: Is CVXpy even in the same domain as those other tools listed here in the replies
--
C++'s private inheritance can be used here to avoid some of the gymnastics, wherein, that private aspect of the class can be passed out into the appropriate party at creation time or otherwise.
To illustrate: https://gist.github.com/arithma/0d96aec5c07e2d8dc24cfc6cd31f...
Note: I have never used this in production as far as I remember.
There are similar other offerings (one that comes to mind is reactstudio, but has a bit more going on there with code and flow.
The chart explains that the human activity effect is at the magnitude of cataclysmic volcanoes, and other global geological/ecological effects. I sure vote that we don't accept the status quo that this stuff happens over millions of years already. We should care, since this time, we actually exist. Nevertheless, I understand how this makes the conversation harder, which is unfortunate but expected in any nuanced discussion. I, by no means, am an expert and I had a similar reaction in the beginning.
To put things in perspective, our current effect in some hundred years, used to take thousands, if not 10s/100s of thousands of years.
I reached solace regarding this itchy issue (not even joking) by considering the following: Primes are the minimal set of numbers to generate another set of numbers, using multiplication (with repetition, yada yada) For the positive numbers, [2, 3, 5, 7, ...] is all we need, considering that, as many others have said, 1 = Product([]).
In that sense, to generate all integers, the integers you need are: [-1, 0, 2, 3, 5, 7..]
Similarly, to generate all gaussian integers (complex numbers with integer components,) you can follow the following link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_integer#Gaussian_prim... however, am not sure why 0 is not considered a prime number in this context.
Gaussian primes are symmetric over the real and imaginary axes, and to me it's quite curious why 0 is not considered prime there, but I guess uniqueness of the multiplication matters too (0 can be repeated multiple times, which could make some theorems about uniqueness of factorization a bit cumbersome as well.)
The base/average salary comparison also makes a lot of sense.
> The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system can never decrease over time.
So instead of entropy increasing, it's hanging around for a while. No violation, still unusual though.