1,064 karma · joined March 11, 2007
Perhaps the solution could be a small usb dongle containing an embedded arm soc with a kind of RAM that doesn't persist at all -- maybe even no RAM at all, just the cpu. The dongle would support just three commands: init, encrypt, decrypt. Init sets the key and algorithm, after which the device doesn't let you change them until the system is powered off. En/decrypt do block-level crypto.
AMD have been shit since forever. There should be a message with giant letters printed on each box saying "THIS PRODUCT DOESN'T HAVE LINUX DRIVERS WORTH A DAMN".
Not that it helps your situation now, but maybe if you upgrade in the future, try with an nvidia card?
Now get ready.
To experience a new terror.
Coming from 419 million years ago,
it rises one last time to swallow you whole!
It's the ANCIENSHARK!!!!!111eleven
Yes, I know it's not a shark, but really - who would go to see the ancient not-shark fish that just sits there with a dumb look on its face?
In the end they cook it and eat it. Then the sequel is that the people who ate the ancient fish start evolving into Neanderthals (sharkderthals?) IN 3D
I wanted it to be something like http://thedailywtf.com/Comments/No,_We_Need_a_Neural_Network...
Note: not affiliated, it's just so perfect.
Useless.
Ah, so it's not just investment advice, but also a practical example of good marketing.
I've always found it rather interesting how the combined mass of Mars and Venus is just about the same as Earth's. Can't we move Venus out to a higher orbit where it would impact with Mars and produce an Earth 2?
This is HN, not a BSD mailing list.
It's only "nifty" until it's put to the test and fails in court. It's "effective" as a way to protect software only in the minds of some Apple engineers; but a judge might not see it that way. There's no precedent to assure anyone that it would work. If there were, I suspect we'd see it in widespread use. Or maybe Apple has tried to patent it?
Perhaps the DMCA exists because "nifty" gimmicks like this one cannot be relied on?
Nice try.
What do they do about users who do not turn on Javascript?
Or users who do not use the popular browsers?
It seems like the malware authors here, government employees or contractors, are just like all the others that form the underbelly of the internet... they only focus on the least sophisticated users or the users who always follow the herd (not the Hurd): Windows and OSX/iOS users.
Assumptions, assumptions, ...
Users who are artists must heed these wise words.
All Hail the Cult Leader.
As for this "poem", I've seen better from kids in elementary school. This speaks to the creative aptitude of Apple's kernel engineers. Certainly not the strongpoint of their workforce.
What sort of royalties or up-front payments did CMU get for letting Apple use their kernel?
The funny part is that one of the early uses of Google's map/reduce approach was probably to distribute the job of sorting search results among many servers. And here you are sorting Hadoop results with something as small and simple as sort(1).
For a minute I thought Arrington was referring to his previous employer, one of the players in the domain name racket, specifically the people who run Pool.com. If ever there was a "service" who viewed users as "zombies", they are it.
Then there's all the herding that TC does, funnelling its readers toward "preferred" money raisers. TC has taken the conflicts of interest inherent in the typical tech media "puff piece" to a new level altogether. If anything needs to be disrupted, it is TC's manipulation of "news".
It's really difficult to take this guy seriously if you know anything about his background. But I guess that excludes most of us "zombies". TC is a pillar of herdlike "thinking". Operations like TC/UC and the ones Arrington criticizes in the "article" share more in common than he may want to admit. Both rely on brainless, herdlike behavior in order to carry out their business plan. If anyone is going to effect a change upon the status quo, it must be users. But the SV that Arrington feeds on has no incentive to educate users to become independent thinkers. Herds are easier to manipulate and, you guessed it, easier to monitor. And Arrington himself is the furthest from an independent thinker I can imagine. He is a parrot.