anfilt

Also don't get me started on how it's pretty hard to find a regular cab pickup. Like the ford maverick only comes in a 4 door configuration. Good luck carrying any standard length items like 4x8 sheet of ply wood or 8 ft lumber without the thing comically hanging out past the tail gate. What I found funny is on fords website you can see just that https://www.ford.com/trucks/maverick/. This is something you even see on larger trucks, and I am like wtf... It's a truck not a people hauler. You might be able to find some manufactures in their commercial/fleet line of vehicles that is at least sane when it comes to bed length.

Honestly, these days it's just better to get a cargo/work van unless you needing to haul dirt or other dirty things when looking for something new. It just seems like a small truck with a bed that make any sense are not made =(

Also these kei class vehicles would not do well on some of the highway speed collision tests.

Moreover these Kei Trucks still have to deal with the 25% chicken tax =(.

However, in some states you can't use off-road vehicles on any roadways, and you would only be able to register such an import as off-road vheicle. Where as you could register 25+ year old on in quite a few states as a low speed vheicle which allows pretty much anything, but highway use.

The only reason I see police deploying this would be to avoid a high speed chase. Where that ends up constitutionally I don't know not a judge or lawyer, but it is one of those imminent danger/pursuit situations the courts have carved for other circumstances.

Now I will say if the police follow someone they are chasing into an other persons house and in that house see drugs. Under most circumstances that could not be used as evidence against the person that lived in the house since they did not have a warrant to search for drugs in the house. Their only legal reason to be there was to catch someone, so anything unrelated to that narrow purpose generally can't be used in court.

But yea they did just announce a micro-wave.

Also unlike some other tool manufactures they still sell all the models of batteries for all the cordless tools from the late 1970's to today. They were the first company to make cordless power tools too. I just find it crazy they still sell batteries for tools getting almost 50 years old.

-edit (added a link)- These batteries are brand new and will work in a makita tool made in 1978. https://www.makitatools.com/products/details/B7000-B-10

The thing is asbestos can occur naturally in and dirt all around the world. There are some places even in the US where dust storms are more dangerous just because this fact. Here's just a short memo about naturally occurring asbestos. https://ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/Naturally_occurring_asb...

I am not saying J&J should get off scotch free if they knew some sources of talc they were using had high levels of asbestos. However, I am gonna say it's not surprising that there may be some contamination. Moreover that's just one form of natural occurring contamination. There other minerals that naturally occur that also are unwanted contaminates such as heavy metals and so forth. What matters is are the contaminants reasonable low for a naturally sourced product since it's not possible to have zero contamination.

Also despite them having some how getting a patent for what is basically just look up tables there is probably prior art. https://patents.stackexchange.com/questions/13629/i-had-inve...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3words#Patent_Validi...

Small changes should be fine in my opinion also it’s not like it’s impossible to also determine the edit distance between two pieces of text.

Amazon could be doing a lot more here.

cothread_t co_active(void); cothread_t co_derive(void, unsigned int, void ()(void)); cothread_t co_create(unsigned int, void (*)(void)); void co_delete(cothread_t); void co_switch(cothread_t); int co_serializable(void);

Also it uses malloc to create the stacks. My library lets decide how wish to allocate stacks with. On linux I recommend mmap since you can create guard pages and such, but it's completely up to. Also I have functions that can let you call an other function on thread stack. This is handy to let you call a function that generates a deep call stack. Otherwise you have to mess around hopping back and forth between couroutines and the main thread context.

Now if this is a problem and the application does not need address space isolation. clone() with the CLONE_VM flag will get rid of this problem, and clone() is nice in the fact you can get more granularity/control. This control basically ranging between most of the continuum between thread and separate process depending on your needs.

The same thing applies to in other instances for example the move to a more cashless society I think the right to use cash is still important for a litany of reasons.

That right to opt out is important especially if it is even more invasive than the analog/real world equivalent.

So unless there is an authoritative mirror somewhere I can't tell you.

As for runtime this is why people follow an ABI. Otherwise lots of things like dynamic linking ect... would not work.

For a few similar things:

* It can Yield from anywhere

* You can push data on the stack when creating a co-routine

* It has a slot for local storage in the coroutine (the library you linked calls it user_data).

* It should be pretty light weight since it uses assembly and saves as little state as possible based off the calling the conventions.

There are differences though. One big difference is I do have functions that let you call functions that generate deep call stacks on the thread stack.

Like you can't install any software on iPhone that has not been "blessed" (aka signed) by one Apple's private keys. Well unless you find an exploit to free the device from their control. What is so crazy about this is Apple does not even own the hardware after they sell it, but they won't let you disable signing in the boot ROM or at the OS level. If it were about security they would at least let you load your own signing keys. It's not though in my opinion it's about control. I even consider it a violation of property rights.

This is simply because if you own something you should be able have full enjoyment of your property without interference. Further, one major fundamental aspect of owning tangible property is the right of exclusion. The cryptographic system Apple has setup allows Apple to control the right of exclusion when it comes to deciding what software the CPU will and will not run. Apple is effectively reserving the right of exclusion regarding what CPU can execute via cryptography. Crucially, when something is sold legally this means all property rights are transferred to the buyer with few exceptions. One being copyright the original holder of the intangible property reserves/retains the right to copy/reproduce. Despite not legally having the right of exclusion Apple decides what can be excluded from running on other peoples hardware even after selling it.

The short and simple is I should be able to decide what to include or exclude from something I own. In this case, one must ask Apple first which shows how your right of exclusion has been infringed.

This also applies to other devices not just iDevices, but anything with locked down boot ROMs/loaders, but Apple is well known for their "walled garden" (I don't like this term nothing garden like about property right violations).

As for tik tok it's an easy target for such government overreach.

Also sometimes just laziness.

Although electron sucks it wastes so much memory.

typedef uint32_t myVec __attribute__((vector_size(16)));

and then when using that type in C, gcc alot times will do a great job vectorizing without having to reach towards intrinsics when looking at the generated code.

Sure it's not standard C, but it still feel like C when using them. Even for things like shuffling it's still pretty logical to just treat it as a function for instance "__builtin_shuffle" that gcc provides to use on those vector types.

The semantics of C can handle such things, it's just not standardized if you get what I am saying. So I get what your saying about the PDP-11.