Like, at levels only seen in 1 out of every 100,000 visitors, making it quite likely you'll be one of the 0.1-% percent if you hold these extreme viewpoints?
17 karma · joined May 28, 2017
Like, at levels only seen in 1 out of every 100,000 visitors, making it quite likely you'll be one of the 0.1-% percent if you hold these extreme viewpoints?
(Not implying Trump or his followers are shit, just that partisan issues attract shitposts and unfruitful emotional discussions.)
I take it privacy means privacy except from your boss, your company and the Govt.? So far fewer guarantees than with self-hosted FOSS alternatives?
Would it matter to you if the conscious entity was organic or mechanic?
Would it matter to you that the copy was from a human, and not "developped from scratch"?
Do you think all highly intelligent conscious being should have a right to freedom from slavery, or does it only apply to natural-born humans?
I can't imagine you'd get sued for putting online a copy of this if you comply with C&D notices, then again I'm very narrow-minded.
Regarding Name Authorities, this article should clarify it somewhat: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authority_control
It's basically an authentication provider maintained by the Library of Congress, which serves to define cannonical identifiers for library-catalogued entities, like books and public figures.
The Library of Congress uses the MARC standard (developed internally) and that is the format of the Name Authorities files: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARC_standards
I'm considering writing a Rust-based one with Linux, BSD, macOS, Windows and Android backends.
Here's an interview with Jordan Peterson that discusses this: https://youtu.be/01Tln_6Bxk0?t=9m40s
Sorry for pulling in the two-party system, I'm in it for the theory on openness vs. conscientiousness.