78 karma · joined June 17, 2010
In a game like Quake you are only as good as your Rail-gun aim it's pure skills.
If you spend years playing Quake/Starcraft, you will be good at it.
The advantages from these kind of games in combatting addiction is that they are hard to become good at
I don't see how that combats addiction. I played competitive Counter-Strike Source for some time, and the main thing that kept me going was just that feeling of competition, and wanting to become better.
WoW's addiction factor is different. It's more like "if I don't do X on day Y, I get behind other people" where in games like Quake/Starcraft, that just doesn't exist.
That's something that he definitely (spelling?) won't say again.
(Although this example is more of a problem with information leakage and not Wikileaks itself, Wikileaks greatly increased the easiness of acessing leaked documents, by allowing anyone with an internet connection to see them and analyse them for themselves, instead of waiting for the media)
He didn't go to the ticket booth and say: "Hey sorry, I can't go, so give me a full refund."
People make mistakes, but they have to be responsible for them.
Quote: "I overbid and my husband won't let me buy these. Sorry and enjoy the game! :)"
Yes, I do agree that it was wrong to scam her on it, but her attitude over the whole situation wasn't the best either.
When she got the offer for 1,000$, she raised it to 1,100$. Then that e-mail that she sent in response isn't so good either.
That can be said for every country. Not every country is a target of a terrorist attack though.
I look both ways when I cross the street.
If you don't look, there is a higher probability of being hit by a car. Therefore, you're trying to control the probability of being hit by a car. You can't do that in regards to a terrorist attack.
I don't check my car for bombs every morning.
Of course not. A bomb on your car would be an attack directly towards you, and you know there is a low probability of that happening.
You weren't directly affected by 9/11, but many people were (or by the London and Madrid bombings, for instance). Of course people are also affected when someone close to them dies prematurely, but as pyre already replied to you, people accept those random causes better than they do accept a terrorist attack.
Also, this has been stated multiple times, but 9/11 wasn't about killing 3,000 people, it was about attacking America as a whole, making people feel that they weren't safe in their own country. Surely you don't feel that way just by knowing that 150,000 humans die of random causes each day.
This is major speculation, but what do you think would've happened if the fourth plane reached the White House/Capitol Building ?
As for trance, I'd recommend listening to something from a few years ago. A friend of mine (registered here actually), advised me to listen to Tiesto's In Concert 2003. On his words, it's one of those sets that once you start listening, you just can't stop.
PS: Also, Tiesto's In Search Of Sunrise 6 has a beginning that I just love: the sound of sea slowly transitioning to trance. You can listen to it on youtube, on a video with the first two tracks from ISOS6.