> does not make value judgements
So we are not allowed to? The Hacker News gatekeeping instinct is particularly hilarious to me.
11,987 karma · joined June 10, 2010
So we are not allowed to? The Hacker News gatekeeping instinct is particularly hilarious to me.
You are confusing training artifacts for "personality."
> could be better for coding and for puzzle-solving, which are not the vast majority of uses of LLMs.
To see a product fail to evolve and merely stratify itself gives a solid hint as to what it's likely future is going to be.
If they grind their own meat or use something like ground chuck or ground round you can get it medium.
So.. then.. why are we advertising to them _at all_?
You answer your own question. There's no reason at this point in history the "room size" needs to be artificially limited. Was the Arm CEO paid for their time? If not, why not?
> absolutely do provide a real service to the rest of us who don't.
It's service for Arm not you. If you wanted unbiased analysis of Intel's position you might seek someone other than a direct competitor. Which makes paywalling this all the more baffling.
You really shouldn't take the absence of evidence as any sort of evidence itself.
Sure, but there could be a disease outbreak, or a pork meat recall that prevents it anyways. The weather, as a factor, is generally insignificant with respect to loss of life events. To the extent they are we can see those events far enough in advance at 7 to 14 days to compensate correctly.
A better example would be "can we launch a space craft from this launch site next year." Even then, we never pick a launch day, we establish a launch window, because we already know, the weather changes fast enough that it's unlikely to remain identical for several days in a row. So conditions on a single day are effectively meaningless.
The Space Shuttle program got even better with this by feeding in wind data from high atmosphere probes back into the launch vehicle software so it could plan it's maneuvers ahead of the wind so it could reduce vehicle stresses to within tolerable parameters. They went from a 20% launch probability to an 80% launch probability with this system.
I mean.. enjoy your BBQ either way just bring some popup tents.
An example from the Karen Reed case, the police, somehow, uploaded a video that had been put through a "mirror filter" and thus showed a vehicle in the opposite orientation from reality. Is your LLM going to notice that?
And GenCast was tested against and older model which performs worse.
> The ENS system has improved significantly since 2019, according to ECMWF machine learning coordinator Matt Chantry. That makes it difficult to say how well GenCast might perform against ENS today.
And the testing makes it "difficult to say." The obvious conclusion is "run a new set of tests" but they'd rather pay of the verge to publish half truths instead.
What you may actually be witnessing is a low awareness society turn into a high awareness one. What is being highlighted is you never should have had that trust in the first place.
What is involved in that inspection and what does it take to actually fully fail it? Is it like most government tests where the first failure means you just have to fix the problems and schedule your retest?
> they pay for private “certifications” like organic, non gmo, etc.
As a consumer these have the _least_ value out of anything on the label to me.
Why would they suddenly become viable? The only way that would happen is if the price of the product is increased to cover the costs of what you're proposing. This will destroy small suppliers and increase the cost of everything to cover a set of risks that you haven't even fully characterized yet.
Now you can just "mdn <something>" in your omnibar and it will take you straight to the subject page or to a search results page.
I find this shortcut invaluable when developing for the web.
Suddenly? We've been doing this for 60 years, most particularly, in South America. It's now just made it's way fully into Europe.
> We know how to do it - we've known for generations.
We know how to do mob rule. We're not particularly good at Democracy. Sometimes the two would produce the same outcome and people do not struggle to notice the difference.
They didn't force anything.
It leaves you with limited understanding of the mechanism, it's efficacy across different populations, the circumstances in which it fails, how bad those failures could get, or how to improve the product in any way whatsoever.
Check out Homeobox Proteins.
Stop NGOs and USAID from being able to buy ads on any issue.
Yet they make no decisions to reduce those expenses. You either have to believe they are incompetent or this statement is on the spectrum of half truth to full on lie.
> What will remain? Paid cinemas?
Libraries. They used to be awesome and no corporation owned them.
> This is stealing and it is illegal
Sure, but, now you're forced to declare an actual value for the items taken. What is a fair price for most of this "content?"
> So that an independent site cannot distribute free information.
The irony is watching independent journalists take "super chat" donations on these corporate platforms. How big of a cut does the corporation get again?
Which is what?
> just because that happened
The subtleties matter. The ads were purchased per issue or over several issues. The publication solicited the advertisers business and not the other way around. The rates were set per publication and were equal for all potential buyers. The ads were static and approved by the publisher before being included for distribution.
Then you get doubleclick now swallowed up by google. Which reversed all of this and reversed all of the incentives as well. So now people publish crap to create automatically filled ad inventory instead of having a more or less fixed inventory which required real work to get contracted buyers for.
Anyways I see all these as "signals of despair." It shouldn't be that shocking it's just the particular form it is taking this news cycle.