afiori

you are right a stack of printed qr codes is better

Yes, but i cannot create a robot that can get married, people do not have the right to give personhood to tools

Woke activists love the word "systemic" for a reason.

If a bunch of good people acting in good faith produce a result an evil mastermind would want does it matter if they are good? On many levels obviously yes, on some practical levels the system and the incentives still need to change.

Weirdly I think humans should have more rights than machines

A legislative solution to Flock seems a lot more feasible than one for literacy

Most uses of .env files are for apps or containers imho, so you could just have a .env file in each folder and configure docker compose /node / whatever to pick it up

courtesy of chatgpt there is also this abomination

    ht tp://[\x00::gg]\t/foo\nbar/%/%QZ/%F?q=<\"|{}>##

% characters must be escaped in URIs at the very least, and _ is not valid in domains

also this one is valid too for the regex

    %_%://%_%.%_%/%_%?%_%#%_%

Also the more companies go in this direction the more "soft power" the EU has on the topic

The elitism of direct democracy is a mystery to me, especially in the case of the US where it is not technically direct and the powers and role of the president are deeply modelled after those of the British crown of the times

> well-formed URI

A parser that assumes the input to be already valid is usually not enough for most applications

according to that regex this is a valid url

__..__..%%%zz..

I would guess that the film was still mastered/produced digitally

you can, but many of those repair can be delicate and require specialized equipment.

The difference between the 2 requirements is the level of technical knowledge needed and the necessary investment in tools

IMO most of these appointments should be done by congress itself, the only reason they are done by the executive is because the role of president was a created on the template of the role of king.

except that without a "prime minister" now there is no separation between the "king" and the fulcrum of political power.

as the term rule of law suggest the legislative branch has the power to make the rules

IMO they entire law should have been target at "replaceable by independent professionals", it is reasonable to require industry standard professional equipment for opening and working on a phone

I think many companies believe they own their cloud hosted DBs

it would be sorta enough to bundle the wasm binary

yes but no... most database allow for at least as many parallel and concurrent writes as there are tables at a minimum.

The "lock on write" problem is that in MySQL i could run a OLAP pipeline for a few hours and have a fully functioning database with degraded perfomance, on SQLite the same pipeline would lock the database for the full hour. (there are surely ways to solve this (eg using the main db as read-only and a secondary db for writes or splitting the writes in incremental transaction), but it is not a "myth".

What I mean is that unsafe code allows you to eg break std invariants (set invalid length to Vec, unlock a locked mutex, etc.) in ways that can be UB, which of these are UB and which can be used "safely" is sort of unknown.

For better or worse they are much more well understood in C as they are front and center of the language semantics

To be pedantic the ad hominem fallacy is about trying to deny an argument by attacking the author, so in a discussion about zig Vs rust if Andrew isn't trying to enter the discussion and just argue "that guy was stinky, glad he is gone" is not really an ad hominem, just not classy let's say.

Just use unsafe then

I agree with your point, but for completeness:

> How is not having to mark your unsafe code as unsafe a good thing?

The problem with unsafe code in Rust is that IIRC nobody actually figured out yet the "rules" of unsafe i.e. which invariants you can stretch and which can cause UB. My (not super up to date) understanding is that this is an active area of research and progress is being made and also that in practice there are many well understood usages.

In short unsafe rust is somewhat worse than C++ as the boundaries of UB are less well understood/defined

A tool to do automatic migrations eg react often publ

This looks like something only a libertarian would like

Well people that have been hearing of the slippery slope fallacy their whole life might end up biased against such an approach

Regexes should have been a structured language not an hodgepodge of DSLs

The issue is that many modern DOM APIs assume js semantics and types (eg promises, iterables, etc) so you need to "reimplement" some js semanthic in wasm; sorta like how apple added a few custom instructions on the M1 chip specifically for the type of floating point operation required by js.

Which makes me think that I have never heard of signed images/artefacts

I understand ai hate but I would rather avoid a future where everybody talks in purposely weird and unstructured sentences to avoid being similar to ai

By necessity a lot of people write very similarly to how llm do