136 karma · joined November 8, 2014
Thanks!
The other half doubled down on MAC address tracking tech, arguing that it still generates meaningful data - http://www.euclidanalyticsblog.com/2014/08/beacons-and-wi-fi... Although I've heard they've started to move toward video and facial recog.
We were so small at the time of the announcement last June that we thought... "Why don't we just build a door counter. How fing hard could that be?"
...turns out it's like way, really fing hard.
But here it is - http://i.imgur.com/zLUMAG8.jpg?1
Well, I guess it could be bad if I knew that it was always quiet and therefore "a drag" (sorry, that was a weird word to use). But I suspect any bar or club that's reasonably solvent, especially in populous cities, has busy times.
Atm though we only show the traffic right now and notify when something is triggered, quiet / trending.
Second, I think there are people out there that are not looking for busy bars. Rather quiet ones. I certainly fall into that category.
We're not in any bars right now, though. I'll get back to you once we have more data.
Parking - I agree. That one company has a unit that senses the presence of a battery in a parking spot.
Other open problems - I think your talking about how datasets affect one another. What's really interesting about that regarding foot traffic is that there currently isn't a way to know how many people came and went. Which means it's currently tough to draw connections between how foot traffic might affect the farmer's market or the subway or the financial district in San Francisco.
Can you explain map demand irrespective of supply?
Checking PDF..
There's another cool company doing parking called Parkifi I think.
Someone else mentioned El Farol Bar. If we're causing too many people to show up or too many to stay home... that would be an awesome problem to have.
Re: Kansas City. Friends with some of the founders / early people over at Zaarly. We're definitely keeping Kansas City in mind ;)
classist?
There was so much homogeneity in tech in '99/'01. So many companies doing very similar things.
I guess I'm wondering: Are we (the tech market) sufficiently diversified in what our companies do? Enough to see segments of the industry pop but not the entirety?
This is an important point.
Jobs, Gates, Ellison, Travis K. are each notorious. We love stories about these guys because they're entertaining and sometimes shocking (I admit, I certainly do, anyway).
You don't read much about Drew Houston or Chesky, except when Dropbox partners with Microsoft or Airbnb elaborately rolls out a new logo. But when Steve Jobs would reply to one customer's email, in his customarily curt fashion, there was always a press field day.
It's possible that "nice" CEOs are less interesting to talk about but no less effective.
Heard they're reworking the whole DM system.