That's another way Kubernetes can take away jobs :).
735 karma · joined December 22, 2011
That's another way Kubernetes can take away jobs :).
In that sense, Perl never had you because Perl probably isn't interested in "having" anyone. Maybe helping out people carry out their work, but not having them. It is about getting things done, without trying to be the next big thing in CS. At least that's what I'd like to believe.
If Python helps you carry out your work better, you should most assuredly and definitely use Python. Ditto with PHP, Go, and all the rest. And Perl.
Half-serious question, did all those replies come from actual human beings?
Reading the original blog post of this story and other comments here, including yours, I get a vague feeling that the communications on google's part are being done either by some kind of a machine, or by humans that can act like a machine, albeit of rather limited capabilities.
We're halfway through 2019, I'm sitting in a small eurozone country and still can't give them my money and order a Google Pixel properly from their site. Using this example because I consider a phone to be a relatively expensive device that probably generates a good profit over its lifetime. Other non-hardware products which produce smaller profits, such as activating a magazine subscription on the Google News application probably don't even register on their radar.
Apple, with all its failings, is always there and never misses the opportunity to ring the cash register. Sometimes they move slowly, but always make it eventually. Won't even go to non-hardware players like Netflix.
Come to think of it, maybe having so much cash is a mixed blessing for Alphabet, because it could be the actual cause if the above mentioned behaviour.
I shortly contemplated getting a new MBPr, but with all the stories circulating about the butterfly keyboards and the touch bar, went with an ifixit battery replacement kit, about 100€.
I'm generally very reluctant to carry out these types of sensitive repairs myself, but opted to do it with help from a friend. If, instead of buying a new one, the customer prefers to keep a 2015 MBPr and is even willing to run the gauntlet of carrying out a difficult repair themselves, something's seriously wrong. And Apple should take notice.
http://www.columbia.edu/~em36/wpdos/#reason
WordPerfect for DOS, in the opinion of many knowledgeable users, is still the greatest program ever written. Some of its features have not been matched even by the latest Windows software, and its interface remains unequaled for efficiency and elegance. Its support for multiple font formats has not been equaled by any other program or operating system, and its support for multiple alphabets, languages, and symbol sets has only been equaled by twenty-first-century versions of Windows, Linux, and the Mac OS.
That's not necessarily a bad thing, and of course people have the right to complain about whatever they wish.
But, can we please all of us stop pretending that we care about freedom, privacy, etc? Because if we did care, we'd put our proverbial money where our mouths are and try to cope with these defects, just to make sure that a higher purpose is served.
(Genuinely don't want to offend anyone nor do I dismiss anyone's problems with Firefox, especially on macosx)
Been using apache2 for like 20+ years now. It is doable to switch to something else, but would probably require effort with various details, etc. It works well for our moderate loads, so not really urgent to change it.
Given a mediocre number of physical machines (say, 40), which is easier, install, setup and maintain a VMWare cluster or a Kubernetes cluster?
If someone has any insight, preferably backed by actual experience, it'll be most appreciated.
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/introducing-windo...
Also, Perl does not exist and is actually an urban legend from the '90s.
I.e. there might be a million cases where justice (correctly) deemed absurd to prosecute a parent for letting the kids play outside. But they'll never make the news.
We don't know which percentage of said individuals' success was due to sheer luck and which due to outright competence. For all we know, the former may very well be beyond 99%.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/09/18/the-risk-of-nu...
The answer you are referring to is explicitly mentioned.