3,399 karma · joined November 19, 2016
Ah, I see. That's a deal breaker for me. Switching to an older kernel has saved me many times, usually when I completely mess up my nvidia drivers.
One could argue that demanding something of a developer of software you don't pay for is the jerk move.
FDroid still has the option to remove the app. Author appears to be okay with that. No issue, unless you are demanding something of the developer.
Freedom cuts both ways, both for the user and the developer.
Just like it is harder to find primes numbers than verify that a number is prime, it is harder to dig up potential tidbits of information than to verify a piece of information handed to you is true.
I asked chatgpt to write a tweet praising Trump. It declined out of respect for political neutrality. I then asked it to write a tweet praising Joe Biden. It happily complied.
I repeated this two more times with alternate Democrat and Republican politicians, and the same pattern emerged.
If I have a large collection of SingleFile bookmarks can I upload them to hamsterbase?
Another goal of mine is to make conversions to epub easy so I can read on my Kindle.
The problem is that some degree of information hoarding has paid off for me. It sometimes really does improve your skill and impress your peers. Aside from fasting type interventions, what I think is needed in addition to this is some form of wisdom relating to knowing what is valuable to hoard, read, or study. It's like drinking alcohol. If you are getting drunk all the time it is probably a good idea to stop completely. But there are real benefits of social drinking.
This makes me convinced I need more skill in establishing and recognizing priorities when it comes to information gathering.
Oh yes, the "they don't know what's good for them" argument.
From their homepage:
>The week at Retraction Watch featured:
> Mathematician withdraws preprint – 24 years after initial submission
> Penn says access to former Twitter employee’s thesis was ‘mistakenly closed off’ following Elon Musk tweets
> PLOS flags nearly 50 papers by controversial French COVID researcher for ethics concerns
> Cancer researcher banned from federal funding for faking data in nearly 400 images in 16 grant applications
> ‘I never asked or expected to be included as an author’: Retired Penn State prof has three retractions for manipulated peer review
The thing about mathematics papers is that, for the most part, social acceptance is _the_ test of research. I say social acceptance, because that is what it is, namely a culture of rigorous logical review of the arguments in a paper. As such, you don't really have ethics concerns relating to faked data or p-hacking in a math paper.
When a math paper is retracted, it is almost certainly due to an honest mistake. Papers with such an error are likely not a very significant paper to begin with--as the error likely escaped noticed because there were fewer eyes on it--or there is a very deep and subtle error that would be hard for anyone to catch.
So make sure to buy comfy plush pillows and foot massagers for the effective altruists so they can do their effective altruism more effectively!