305 karma · joined November 3, 2018
* Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if (1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and (2) is likely to incite or produce such action. *
From that quote, I think it is pretty clear that the posts from Marjorie Greene would not pass the test and are thus eligible for first amendment protection (if Twitter was a government entity).
Caveat: Not an American, just a curious neighbour to the north.
[1] https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/970/incitement-to-i... [2] https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/189/brandenburg-v-o...
A cursory look at the raw VAERS data from the CDC[1] shows:
Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem. (...) During this time, VAERS received 10,688 reports of death (0.0022%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA clinicians review reports of death to VAERS including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records.
In contrast, the CDC[2] estimates that 817k people have died of Covid-19 in the US which puts the mortality at 248 deaths per 100k individuals. Currently, an unvaccinated individual has 20x the risk of dying from Covid-19 than someone with a booster.
I am no first amendment scholar, but spreading lies that increase people rate of mortality by 20x seems pretty close to the "shouting fire in a crowded theater" exception to protected speech. That puts aside the fact that Twitter is a private platform, thus first amendment laws do not apply.
[1] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/ad... [2] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/mortality-overview.htm
Could you elaborate on how phase noise would cause an issue in this scenario?
N.B. Most of my experience is in optical systems, my wireless knowledge is limited.
- Mux complexity would be drastically increased which costs area, power and latency.
- Additional gearboxing around SRAM's would be far more complex.
They do very thorough HFSS simulations for fighter jets, having RF noise immunity without having to use heavy shielded wiring is a great benefit.
Splicing can be rough, but it's by no means impossible. With the right equipment, you can expect <0.3dB loss from a splice. That's not a lot in these very short links.
I’ve personally used HLS C++, GTest and UVM. It’s pretty effective but there’s definitely room for improvement.
I have experience with C++ HLS and it has enabled massive reductions in verification time.
[1] https://www.pcg-random.org/posts/xoshiro-repeat-flaws.html
[1] https://m.aliexpress.com/item/33038670915.html?spm=a2g0n.pro...
[1] https://winprotocoldoc.blob.core.windows.net/productionwindo...
What's your workflow to go from handwriting (on iPad?) to mathpix to desktop?
Not saying that Borg is necessarily the best solution, just that we should evaluate the important metrics.