26,409 karma · joined March 16, 2009
pius@alum.mit.edu https://pius.me
That's a vacuous argument. No one's Hitler except Hitler. No one called him Hitler except in your strawman. We can only judge the President-elect on what his stated plans are.
And one of his plans is literally to make Muslims register the same way Jews were made to register before the Holocaust. IBM faced an analogous choice: cut ties for moral reasons or preserve the relationship for expediency's sake.
The historical precedent is germane.
YC has a choice: do what IBM did in the 1930's or not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust
And before you say I'm "going Godwin," remember: It was Sam and Paul who've said they think Trump is a threat of similar proportions. If Sam really thinks that, the moral thing to do is cut ties.
And yes, it'll be hard. Would have been easier to do before the election. It will only get harder.
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-says-he-...
https://www.ycombinator.com/rfs/
The longer YC waits to do the right thing on this, the worse it will get.
Engaging in that sort of knowledge nihilism makes it impossible to have honest, rational debates because it doesn't allow for participants to agree on even the most basic of facts.
In fact, I'd be ashamed to say I didn't.
If you truly believe Trump is an unprecedented threat to democracy in the league of Stalin, how would you feel telling your children that "it was just business" when you kept on a partner who was part of his campaign apparatus?
I don't think IBM is particularly proud of their management during the 1930's. No one knows or cares about the personal views of the people behind those decisions, just what they led IBM to do.
Shouldn't individuals have a right to have terrible opinions?
Of course they do. But a surprising number of “free speech” and “free market” people don’t seem to understand how either works.
Individuals have a right to support white nationalists.
Individuals also have a right not to do business with those who support white nationalists.
Individuals also have the right to organize protests against those who support white nationalists.
Let's be clear: defending the right to support a white nationalist while denouncing the right to protest against one isn’t courage, it’s sophistry.
That's neither fair nor accurate. Google wants to do VR at Android scale and they're starting with their flagship phone. The claim about the display and vomiting just isn't true.
God forbid we come together on WebVR instead of turning the VR space into yet another "monopolies punching eachother" not-invented-here pit fight.
People are coming together on WebVR! Chrome, Edge, Firefox, the GearVR browser all have experimental support for it and the spec is working its way through the W3C review process.
Your comment is not going to age well.
Given that Firebase seems to have become the foundation of Google's mobile app development offering I'm guessing ... pretty well?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I wouldn't assume that. Developer-friendly natural language APIs will only become more important over the next few years.
The DCP is just a digital print (what movie theaters play for digital releases instead of the reels of film that go with analog releases). It's not really about resolution per se, it's just a term for the whole package that the theater gets.
We should encourage people to make their research accessible to a broader audience, not engage in catty sniping and whinging when they get recognized for their work.
Building society-changing products and startups doesn't count anymore? Twitter seems like a pretty big deal.
They returned their first fund twice over ... in three years.
http://fortune.com/2012/07/24/nice-ira-andreessen-horowitz-r...
Those two were published originally in Different Seasons, which had three of its four novellas adapted into movies. (Stand by Me, The Shawshank Redemption, and Apt Pupil)
There is a disgusting "argument" being made here, but I'm not the one making it.
Integrity? Self-respect?
edit: OP removed the snark from the comment.
I'm sensitive to your viewpoint, but it's one thing to argue that state and federal institutions ought to take the lead on solving homelessness and quite another to suggest that the city ought to contribute nothing to the solution.