It wasn't submitted to let people know about the feature, it was submitted to stir the pot.
1 karma · joined December 25, 2024
It wasn't submitted to let people know about the feature, it was submitted to stir the pot.
Might be outdated, but you TFoT2 is free:
.................................
Look at awesomewm (dude wrote it)
>Also, in Scheme and other functional languages, function calls in the tail position are compiled or otherwise treated as jumps.
So that is why people make such a big deal about tail-call optimization? Because it prevents stack overflow?
Am I missing anything?
EDIT: I wrote this before reading the article
EDIT: On second thought, the new iPods (iPhones) have the ear piece for the phone in the middle.
- finding one of these talismans of productivity
- actually trying it out
- blogging about it
- staying with it
I have a feeling the first 3 occur pretty rapidly.
created: 33 minutes ago
Personally, I use processing.js because I can use all the existing Processing examples as a point of reference. It is easier to get the ball rolling as opposed to starting from scratch.
As a plus, the experience I get with processing.js, I will be able to apply to Processing (as you probably know, Processing is often used to graph output from an Arduino board, something else I have as a hobby).
I am unfamiliar with your slang. Can you elaborate please?