WolfOliver

I guess a lot of users do not want to deal with Git hence Overleaf is so successful.

with what tool was this article written?

thanks, that is helpful

React has a history of solid backwards compatibility. IMO one of the top reasons to choose React. You do not have to worry that much if the framework is still around in two years.

Also - as the article mentioned - everybody knows react.

This are two reasons why picking react is almost every time the right choice.

How the internal rendering works and if it is a little faster or slower is just an implementation detail.

Your's has to little upvotes. I think it is only detected as duplicate if it had made the front page in the last few months.

looking at the examples, it looks more like a Rails alternative?

I can not try it out without entering payment information?

I'm working on something similar. Check out MonsterWriter

BTW. Your domain authority is 0 but you claim your app ist trusted by teams from GitHub, AWS, MongoDB, ... Hard to believe.

I don't get this trust discussion. I don't trust myself not to do a mistake, why should I trust somebody else.

Also - while pair programming is great - it does not replace a code review. When you do pair programming you start working on the problem at the same time, you get tiered and annoyed of the problem at the same time. You want to go to lunch break at the same time. All reasons to slip in a sloppy solution and convince each other it is actually ok.

While doing code review you get a fresh perspective on the matter.

lol, when I press the play button to read the text, it just reads "undefined"

An app which is build for cheating complains about cheating ...

I think in 5 years from now we will see a major software dev shortage. Mainly because of all the reports that big tech companies are replacing devs with AI which scares new students to sign up for a CS degree.

The truth is that those devs who has been replaced should not have been hired in the first place as the companies were already overstuffed.

users who bought a license of MonsterWriter version 1 three years ago are using the latest version today without any additional payment.

I'm thinking to open source parts of it, like the text editor.

It is not a full notion replacement yet. But having team workspaces is around the corner as well as other knowledge management features.

Yes the editor is self build and it supports concurrent edits. You can try this out in the browser version and invite a coauthor.

currently the window binary is not code signed. This is a major problem and a lot of users complain. Even thought the code signing certificates are quite expensive I'm aiming to have this done sometime soon.

you can also download it from the mac app store: https://apps.apple.com/de/app/monsterwriter-thesis-papers/id...

I was wondering why the creation of docx files does not seem to have any formatting options but just plain text? Is this not required in legal context?

I'm a little bit confused, it says "Find clothing styles that flatter your figure" in the top part of the website but then never picks up on this. Is this feature really supported?

You can login in the browser version, this will work on Linux. But the at the moment there is no build available to run the desktop app on Linux.

I would love to read some feedback on MonsterWriter. It is my side-project made to make LaTeX accessible for everybody.

I would love to read your feedback how it works with MonsterWriter.

1. Download the app [01] 2. Create a new empty document 3. Insert a markdown section type 4. past your markdown code into the markdown section 5. click on "Preview & Export" 6. Configure your PDF

I'm the creator of MonsterWriter. For complex markdown it probably has some shortcomings but I would love to hear what is missing for your use case.

[01] https://www.monsterwriter.com/

I guess DeepSeek payed OpenAI for the usage of their API according to OpenAI's pricing?

So what is the point if you pay for it and can not use the results how you see fit?

Nice to Know: Buildpacks are also usable with Cloud Foundry - an enterprise grade open source PaaS which is used by a lot of large corporations.

but it can provide recommendations

"Until this change, customers who have used fewer resources have covered the costs, in a way, for other customers who have used much more resources." ... This argument does not make sense. I use very few resources but have to pay more.

I'm the creator of MonsterWriter. MonsterWriter uses a very simple CRDT for JSON payload (references index, export config). For the collaboration on the actual text it uses OT. When I started to implement this 7 years ago. CRDT weren't a thing.

I'am always skeptical about this offline use case. Is it really as important as the CRDT community claims?

If you are on a plain, you could also just read a book.

Graph Based RAG systems look promising https://www.ontotext.com/knowledgehub/fundamentals/what-is-g...