81,011 karma · joined October 31, 2009
The flaw in that is what is the reference frame? The tectonic plate Seattle is sitting on is going down under the cascade mountains.
And beaches have been eroding for millions of years.
It's still wrong. Having a need does not entitle one to steal. Honor is not something you apply only when it doesn't cost you.
Arbitrage forces say otherwise.
> Especially with how the market has been lately, the gains erase any burden of the loan.
And when the market goes down, you get a margin call and get wiped out.
Of course it does. The landlord's costs factor into the supply made available by landlords.
> When landlords' costs drop, do they drop the rent in response?
Competition says they do.
Recall that I wrote this to you:
"I did not say there was no injustice happening. Nor did I say that all laws are just."
> “they knew the law and chose to break it, therefore they get what’s coming to them”
Please don't make up quotes and attribute them to me. That's called the strawman fallacy.
Nor did I say that all laws are just.
I'm not your honey, either.
Blaming society for one's own actions is dishonorable. You get to choose, and you are responsible for your choice.
> The existence of a policy to help grocery stores in high crime areas doesn't support your thesis since it's going to be used on a vast minority of stores, not indicative of "rampant" (most stores in Seattle seem fine in my experience), and not indicative of a broader trend in trust.
Grocery stores in Seattle are shutting down, and looting is a major contributing factor to it.
Take a look at the long term results in the stock market. It's pretty hard to argue that all those successful companies, growing year after year, are actually choosing short term profit over long term success.
It is simple. People have free will. Bad people know what right and wrong is, and they chose wrong.
It's always someone else's fault.
In my college daze, Chuck Jones dropped by to give a talk to a packed auditorium. Of course, what he showed was What's Opera Doc. We all loved it, and Chuck enjoyed our enthusiasm.
A business has limited resources, and somebody has to decide which hill they're going to conquer.
The reason managers make more is because their decisions can make more / lose more money than the workers.
BTW, in every company I've worked for, all of the workers thought they were smarter than the manager (including yours truly). The funny part would be when one would be promoted into management, and instantly became incompetent in the estimation of the other workers.