This article is more about the man than about what he does. There are lots of people who try to stop diseases and epidemics. The difference is, its Bill Gates and its posted on a tech-heavy news site.
124 karma · joined August 3, 2013
Its another topic in how far down-votes are a good idea. Somehow, its a populist regulation of communicating non-conform thoughts.
The free software culture slowly recovers. But we are still far away from the good old and worthy traditions for commercial software developers.
I don't throw stones because of the mistakes someone made. I throw stones because of the lack of will or understanding why to fix the own mistake when he is capable of it.
There are better ways to achieve a better living for everyone. No one needs to suffer or to die for that. The path is important.
Hm. I never heard of blocks in the pirate party. Luckily, it seems that the core pirates are too liberal for that. Things could go wrong, but then we simply start a new party.
And yes, we must listen to everyone. Whatever troll it might be. You must listen them to tell them otherwise and to learn from them. It might be the only way a democracy can function well.
Fast communication is actually just a feature for the outer world to tell them, what we work for, in time. Too often it isn't clear what we stand for to a fresh topic. The media is complaining and the reader starts to think badly about us.
I'm not sure what people want to achieve. So, how well works Scalable Vector Graphics for you?
Inability to determine the order of program execution
I don't think that pointers or mutable variables are important, when you are a pure functional or logic programmer.
Well, most of the time, no one else needs to understand it ...
Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other.
Like the issue with RegEx, its probably better to use nice English words in code to describe a problem solution, so that other people can understand it faster (before they get demotivated).
I haven't seen exactly the same corresponding monad. But I would compare it with existing backtracking monads used for logic programming. My point is, that a backtracking monad in general is a well known concept. Your special point is the rollback, which isn't included in the monads i saw. I think that people, who worked with backtracking monads, know that they could implement a rollback if needed.
Definitely. Love it.